* New unaligned-accessed arch flag?
@ 2001-03-15 3:00 Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2001-03-15 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Instead of putting arch-specific ifdefs in drivers, would it be
reasonable to add a per-arch flag UNALIGNED_PROFITABLE? Arch-specific
ifdefs all over the default rx_copybreak values in net drivers are the
example I have in mind, but it seems like it would be good knowledge
that can be easily exposed to the rest of the kernel.
--
Jeff Garzik | May you have warm words on a cold evening,
Building 1024 | a full mooon on a dark night,
MandrakeSoft | and a smooth road all the way to your door.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-03-15 3:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-03-15 3:00 New unaligned-accessed arch flag? Jeff Garzik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox