public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: watermodem <aquamodem@ameritech.net>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Jiffy question and sound.
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:20:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AB5A53F.F8B0373B@ameritech.net> (raw)

With the 2.4.0 kernel the loops_per_sec field was replaced (for i386)
with current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy.

So... since I am using the ALSA drivers that Mandrake supplied, for the
2.4.x series of kernels I replaced the equated #define with


#define LOOPS_PER_SEC current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy * 100

This seems to build modules that work for 2.4.0.   However, if you play
many songs then do some heavy disk I/0 after awhile the songs start
sounding like a hellicoptor is hovering right next to the speakers.   
This wasn't too bad as it usually took about 30 to 40 mins to go
south.   

Now compiling the same  ALSA modules with 2.4.2 this problem happens
much quicker and you don't need any other activity.  In fact it is hard
to play more than half a song.  (MP3)
It doesn't matter if what set of music players or tools I use the
problem is quite visible.

When I boot back to the original 2.2.x kernel everything is perfect.   

So I guess I have a few questions here.
 1)   Is a jiffy 100th of a second or is it smaller  (so my loop count
is starving things.) (10ms) ?
 2)   Why is it so much worse in 2.4.2 than 2.4.0?
 3)   Any other "gotch's" that are important to watch for when moving
2.2.x drivers to 2.4.x?

Thanks....

Watermodem

             reply	other threads:[~2001-03-19  6:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-19  6:20 watermodem [this message]
2001-03-19  9:46 ` Jiffy question and sound Matti Aarnio
2001-03-20  4:22   ` watermodem
2001-03-20  4:53     ` watermodem

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3AB5A53F.F8B0373B@ameritech.net \
    --to=aquamodem@ameritech.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox