From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: james <jdickens@ameritech.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ideas for the oom problem
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 20:14:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AC13ADD.1341E7AE@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.21.0103272151580.8261-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva
Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, james wrote:
>
> > Here are my ideas on how too deal with the oom situation,
>
> > I propose a three prong approach too this problem
>
> Isn't that a bit much for an emergency situation that never
> even occurs on most systems ?
I've been using our internal tree for my testing, and I'm reluctant to let my
experiences there cause me to draw conclusions about other trees. So, will
you please tell me which version of the kernel you think has a vm that only
triggers the oom killer in emergency situations so I can test it here to see
if you are right?
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> http://people.redhat.com/dledford
Please check my web site for aic7xxx updates/answers before
e-mailing me about problems
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-28 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-27 21:29 [PATCH] mm/memory.c, 2.4.1 : memory leak with swap cache (updated) Richard Jerrell
2001-03-27 21:18 ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-27 23:10 ` Richard Jerrell
2001-03-27 22:57 ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-28 0:53 ` Ideas for the oom problem james
2001-03-28 0:52 ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-28 1:14 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2001-03-28 3:21 ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-28 3:41 ` Doug Ledford
2001-03-28 3:53 ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-28 1:39 ` james
2001-03-28 5:52 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-03-28 6:16 ` Disturbing news Shawn Starr
2001-03-28 6:33 ` Disturbing news.. Idea Shawn Starr
2001-04-21 0:43 ` Serious Latency problems : 2.4.4-pre5 Shawn Starr
2001-03-28 7:19 ` Disturbing news Matti Aarnio
2001-03-28 7:27 ` Shawn Starr
2001-03-28 12:08 ` Jesse Pollard
2001-03-28 5:50 ` Ben Ford
2001-03-28 12:50 ` Walter Hofmann
2001-03-28 14:04 ` Simon Williams
2001-03-28 15:04 ` Olivier Galibert
2001-03-28 15:49 ` Simon Williams
2001-03-28 11:57 ` Ben Ford
2001-03-29 8:02 ` Helge Hafting
2001-03-28 17:51 ` Olivier Galibert
2001-03-28 12:53 ` Keith Owens
2001-03-28 13:00 ` Russell King
2001-03-28 14:10 ` Sean Hunter
2001-03-28 15:36 ` john slee
2001-03-28 16:18 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-04-02 23:10 ` Dr. Kelsey Hudson
2001-03-28 17:29 ` Horst von Brand
2001-03-28 10:00 ` Helge Hafting
2001-03-28 13:25 ` Alexander Viro
2001-03-28 14:32 ` Romano Giannetti
2001-03-28 14:57 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2001-03-28 14:57 ` Alexander Viro
2001-03-28 16:14 ` Romano Giannetti
2001-03-28 14:38 ` Ideas for the oom problem Hacksaw
2001-03-28 15:56 ` Andreas Rogge
2001-03-28 23:33 ` Hacksaw
2001-03-28 23:47 ` Tim Haynes
2001-03-29 0:12 ` Hacksaw
2001-03-27 21:51 ` [PATCH] mm/memory.c, 2.4.1 : memory leak with swap cache (updated) Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AC13ADD.1341E7AE@redhat.com \
--to=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jdickens@ameritech.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox