public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Jeremy Jackson <jerj@coplanar.net>
Cc: Ian Soboroff <ian@cs.umbc.edu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /proc/config idea
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 20:23:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AC91800.22D66B24@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877l13whzw.fsf@danube.cs.umbc.edu> <3AC89389.46317572@coplanar.net>

Jeremy Jackson wrote:
> Yes, I like this.  I do this manually, it allows reproducability, and
> incremental
> modifications, tracing how that kernel on that problem system was made...
> 
> I think the ultimate would be to put all of .config (gzipped?) in a new ELF
> section without the Loadable attribute...  I wish System.map was the same.
> The you're guaranteed you know how a kernel on disk was configured.
> 
> To correlate a running kernel to one on disk (vmlinuz) you have LILO...
> it appends an environment variable to the kernel command line with
> the name of the file it booted.  This is not infallable, since LILO maps
> disk sectors, only using the filesystem at map install time.
> 
> Permaps an md5sum of the .text ELF section would conclusively
> link the in-core kernel with an on-disk vmlinuz?  Shouldn't be hard
> to do with objcopy and /proc/kmem?
[...]
> Comments anyone?

Instead of doing all this stuff in the kernel, you could simply update
symlinks to properly installed files at boot time.

Putting _files_ in the kernel is plain silly.  This is unreclaimable
memory, folks.  There is no need to special case an operation as simple
as reading a file.  [I think this about firmware images too, but that's
another thread]

-- 
Jeff Garzik       | May you have warm words on a cold evening,
Building 1024     | a full moon on a dark night,
MandrakeSoft      | and a smooth road all the way to your door.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-04-03  0:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-02 13:25 /proc/config idea Ian Soboroff
2001-04-02 14:58 ` Jeremy Jackson
2001-04-02 15:19   ` Brian Gerst
2001-04-02 15:28   ` Bart Trojanowski
2001-04-03  0:23   ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2001-04-03  0:37     ` Jeremy Jackson
2001-04-03  0:49       ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-03  2:52         ` David Lang
2001-04-03 11:18           ` Olaf Titz
2001-04-03 12:27           ` Alan Cox
2001-04-03 12:43             ` Jeremy Jackson
2001-04-03 14:32               ` Alan Cox
2001-04-03  0:39     ` David Lang
2001-04-03  5:56       ` Michal Jaegermann
2001-04-03 14:13       ` J . A . Magallon
2001-04-03 18:46         ` Ben Ford
2001-04-03 19:11           ` Alan Cox
2001-04-03 19:12           ` J . A . Magallon
2001-04-03 19:30             ` Mike Castle
2001-04-04 11:56               ` GOMBAS Gabor
2001-04-03 20:57             ` Ben Ford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3AC91800.22D66B24@mandrakesoft.com \
    --to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
    --cc=ian@cs.umbc.edu \
    --cc=jerj@coplanar.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox