From: "Stephen E. Clark" <sclark46@gte.net>
To: Trevor Nichols <ocdi@ocdi.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: uninteruptable sleep
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 09:32:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AC9D108.CBE9C2BB@gte.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0104032217220.60098-100000@ocdi.sb101.org>
That happened to me with 2.4.2-ac28 when I tried using DRM.
I also got the following messages in syslog.
/var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:15:04 joker kernel:
[drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed!
/var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:15:04 joker kernel:
[drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed!
/var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:15:15 joker kernel:
[drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed!
/var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:15:15 joker kernel:
[drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed!
/var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:15:16 joker kernel:
[drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed!
/var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:15:40 joker kernel:
[drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed!
/var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:16:18 joker kernel:
[drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed!
/var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:16:31 joker kernel:
[drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed!
/var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:16:32 joker kernel:
[drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed!
/var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:16:45 joker kernel:
[drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed!
/var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:16:45 joker kernel:
[drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed!
/var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:16:48 joker kernel:
[drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed!
/var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:16:49 joker kernel:
[drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed!/
So I turned off DRI in X 4.0.3
HTH
Steve
Trevor Nichols wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Since upgrading to the latest stable (2.4.3) kernel, I've noticed that
> randomly some processes are going into an uninteruptable sleep and not
> waking up at all.
>
> It's happened to nautilus and today just happened to mozilla also.
> Another common related problem is the load averages go up to n + "normal"
> where n is the number of processes that have gone uninteruptable sleep.
> This is making me think it's a kernel related problem.
>
> I had one time where nautilus with 9 [presumably forked] processes of
> itself go this way, causing load averages to go 9+, however the system
> doesn't appear to be straining or strugling under that much load.
>
> The previous kernel version that I was using (2.4.1) did not have this
> problem.
>
> One last thing, if this turns out to be a non-kernel problem, the
> processes that *do* get stuck, are unkillable - even by root with SIGKILL.
> Is there any way for it to be able to? :) So far I have to reboot each
> time it happens.
>
> Best regards,
> Trevor Nichols.
>
> ps please CC replies to my address. thanks.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-03 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-03 13:08 uninteruptable sleep Trevor Nichols
2001-04-03 13:32 ` Stephen E. Clark [this message]
2001-04-08 1:56 ` Anton Blanchard
2001-04-03 14:35 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-03 16:13 ` Trevor Nichols
2001-04-03 18:04 ` J Sloan
2001-04-03 23:09 ` Trevor Nichols
2001-04-04 19:30 ` andersg
2001-04-05 15:47 ` Christian Pernegger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-03 16:40 Manfred Spraul
2001-04-04 16:07 ` christophe barbe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AC9D108.CBE9C2BB@gte.net \
--to=sclark46@gte.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ocdi@ocdi.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox