From: Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>,
Wade Hampton <whampton@staffnet.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pcnet32 (maybe more) hosed in 2.4.3
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 09:15:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ACC1B85.9EDEDD3A@mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010330190137.A426@indiana.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0103311541300.406-100000@fs131-224.f-secure.com> <20010403202127.A316@bacchus.dhis.org> <3ACB2323.C1653236@mips.com> <3ACB3CA5.D978EF41@staffnet.com> <3ACB8098.DFEC12D7@vc.cvut.cz> <20010404235124.B3102@alpha.franken.de>
Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 01:14:16PM -0700, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > VMware is working on implementation PCnet 32bit mode in emulation (there
> > is no such thing now because of no OS except FreeBSD needs it). But
> > my question is - is there some real benefit in running chip in
> > 32bit mode?
>
> probably not.
In some 32bit bigendian systems you need to do address-swapping before doing any
16 bit (or 8 bit) PCI accesses, whereas 32 bit (full bus width) doesn't need any
swapping, and therefor it would be more efficient.
>
> > so is 32bit mode needed for bigendian ports, or what's reasoning
> > behind it?
>
> I've added 32bit mode for some IBM PowerPC machines. The firmware
> on this machines setup the chip to DWIO and I haven't found a way
> to switch it back to WIO.
I got the same issue on one of my platforms, the firmware setup the chip to DWIO
and the only thing that will bring it back to WIO is a hardware reset.
>
>
> Thomas.
>
> --
> Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a
> good idea. [ Alexander Viro on linux-kernel ]
--
_ _ ____ ___ Carsten Langgaard Mailto:carstenl@mips.com
|\ /|||___)(___ MIPS Denmark Direct: +45 4486 5527
| \/ ||| ____) Lautrupvang 4B Switch: +45 4486 5555
TECHNOLOGIES 2750 Ballerup Fax...: +45 4486 5556
Denmark http://www.mips.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-05 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-31 0:01 pcnet32 (maybe more) hosed in 2.4.3 Scott G. Miller
2001-03-31 0:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-03-31 13:58 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-03 18:21 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-04-04 13:35 ` Carsten Langgaard
2001-04-04 15:24 ` Wade Hampton
2001-04-04 20:14 ` Petr Vandrovec
2001-04-04 21:51 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2001-04-04 23:22 ` Petr Vandrovec
2001-04-05 7:26 ` Carsten Langgaard
2001-04-05 7:15 ` Carsten Langgaard [this message]
[not found] ` <2001040423 <3ACC1E35.4D2F7506@mips.com>
2001-04-05 18:27 ` Petr Vandrovec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ACC1B85.9EDEDD3A@mips.com \
--to=carstenl@mips.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=whampton@staffnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox