From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 01:54:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 01:54:24 -0400 Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.214]:38929 "EHLO TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 01:54:15 -0400 Message-ID: <3AD46091.C43A413@ntsp.nec.co.jp> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:48:01 +0000 From: "Adrian V. Bono" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: ppp performance degradation? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Could anyone please explain the major changes to the ppp module from 2.4.1 to 2.4.3? I've noticed that ppp performance isn't as fast as it was using 2.4.1, and after a week using 2.4.3 i've concluded that ppp is definitely slower. I've looked at the ppp_* files but so far the only changes i saw were ppp_cleanup() being made static, and a new line added to ppp_generic.c. Perhaps the major changes are in the rest of the network code? Adrian