From: Roberto Nibali <ratz@tac.ch>
To: Steve Hill <steve@navaho.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, becker@scyld.com,
maurizio.quadrio@polimi.it, harry@navaho.co.uk
Subject: Re: Fix for Donald Becker's DP83815 network driver (v1.07)
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:16:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ADC6C70.1590D9B7@tac.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0104171653110.4446-200000@sorbus.navaho>
Steve Hill wrote:
>
> The attached patch fixes the following problems with the DP83815 driver
> (natsemi.c):
>
> 1. When compiled into the kernel, the cards would be registered multiple
> times.
I assume this code fragment fixes this:
+ static int done = 0;
+
+ if (done) return -ENODEV;
if (pci_drv_register(&natsemi_drv_id, dev) < 0)
return -ENODEV;
+ done = 1;
My 2 questions are:
Is this an acceptable fix for Donald? Because if so, I'd like to submit it
for the starfire quardboard driver.
--- starfire.c-old Tue Apr 17 18:11:07 2001
+++ starfire.c Tue Apr 17 18:12:37 2001
@@ -378,8 +378,12 @@
#ifndef MODULE
int starfire_probe(struct net_device *dev)
{
+ static int done = 0;
+
+ if (done) return -ENODEV;
if (pci_drv_register(&starfire_drv_id, dev) < 0)
return -ENODEV;
+ done = 1;
printk(KERN_INFO "%s" KERN_INFO "%s", version1, version2);
return 0;
}
Is there no implication with PCI latencies if multiple such cards
are loaded? I'm still having problems initializing more then 4
Quadboards.
Regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
mailto: `echo NrOatSz@tPacA.cMh | sed 's/[NOSPAM]//g'`
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-17 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-17 15:58 Fix for Donald Becker's DP83815 network driver (v1.07) Steve Hill
2001-04-17 16:16 ` Roberto Nibali [this message]
2001-04-17 16:30 ` Steve Hill
2001-04-17 17:12 ` Roberto Nibali
2001-04-18 10:25 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-04-18 11:32 ` Steve Hill
2001-04-18 15:14 ` Tim Hockin
2001-04-18 20:33 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-04-18 20:40 ` Steve Hill
2001-04-19 10:54 ` Roberto Nibali
2001-04-19 13:06 ` Roberto Nibali
2001-04-20 5:48 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-04-20 6:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-20 7:09 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-04-20 7:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-20 9:49 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-04-20 9:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-20 10:05 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-04-20 16:10 ` Roberto Nibali
2001-04-20 16:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-20 16:50 ` Roberto Nibali
2001-04-20 19:27 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-04-20 9:03 ` Roberto Nibali
2001-04-20 9:42 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-04-20 10:12 ` Roberto Nibali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ADC6C70.1590D9B7@tac.ch \
--to=ratz@tac.ch \
--cc=becker@scyld.com \
--cc=harry@navaho.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maurizio.quadrio@polimi.it \
--cc=steve@navaho.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox