public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: kernel space getcwd()? (using current() to find out cwd)
@ 2001-04-17 22:43 Brian J. Watson
  2001-04-17 23:28 ` Brian J. Watson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian J. Watson @ 2001-04-17 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mike; +Cc: Linux Kernel

> This is probably a stupid question, and probably directed to the wrong
> list. Apologies in advance, but I'm stumped
> 
> I've been working on a kernel module to report on "changed files". It
> works just fine -- I wrap the orignal system calls with my
> [...]


At least in the 2.4 kernels, there's already a __d_path() routine (fs/dcache.c)
that builds the pathname using the mechanism you discussed.

Here's one way you could use it:

char *
kgetcwd()
{
	char *path = (char *) __get_free_page(GFP_USER);
        struct vfsmnt *pwdmnt;
        struct dentry *pwd;

        if (!path)
                return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);

        read_lock(&current->fs->lock);
        pwdmnt = mntget(current->fs->pwdmnt);
        pwd = dget(current->fs->pwd);
        read_unlock(&current->fs->lock);

        spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
        path = __d_path(pwd, pwdmnt, NULL, NULL, path, PAGE_SIZE);
        spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);

        mntput(pwdmnt);
        dput(pwd);

        return path;
}


If you only want the pathname back to the process root, use d_path() instead
(and don't grab the dcache_lock).

When you're done with path, free it with free_page() and not kfree().

BTW, I'm not subscribed to the kernel mailing list (I just read it on the web),
so please copy me on any response.


--
Brian Watson
Compaq Computer

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* kernel space getcwd()? (using current() to find out cwd)
@ 2001-04-16 22:42 Michael L. Welles
  2001-04-17 12:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael L. Welles @ 2001-04-16 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel


This is probably a stupid question, and probably directed to the wrong
list.  Apologies in advance, but I'm stumped

I've been working on a kernel module to report on "changed files". It
works just fine -- I wrap the orignal system calls with my
replacements which queue the filenames being modified, and when
another proccess reads from the device or proc entry, they get a nice
snapshot of what's going on in the system -- except that all the paths
are relative to the calling process.

So, a little ignorance being a dangerous thing, I thought I'd be clever
and manually reconstruct the full path by walking up
current->fs->pwd->d_parent and padding d_name to the filename until it
hits root.

Unfortunatly, this approach causes kernel panics.  e.g., the attached
code snippet will inevitably bring down the machine if I call it
during in my replacement open, mkdir, rmdir, unlink routines -- and
tehy all work fine without itq. 

What am I not getting? I do see, before I go down, that there's a few
occasions where current() is NULL... 

Apologies in advance for a wordy, probably stupid question, but I'm
stumped.   

If this is not the right approach for what I'm trying to do (e.g. a
kernel space getcwd()), can someone point me to something else I can try?

Thanks in advance, 

Mike Welles


----------------------------------------

(this is the greatly reduced version which does nothing but try and
reference current->fs->pwd)

void fill_full_path(char *name)
{ 
    if (current==NULL) 
    { 
#ifdef DEBUG
	  printk("ERROR! current == NULL\n"); 
#endif
	  return; 
    }

  if (current->fs==NULL) 
    { 
#ifdef DEBUG
	  printk("ERROR! current-> == NULL\n"); 
#endif
	  return; 
    }

  if (current->fs->pwd==NULL) 
    { 
#ifdef DEBUG
	  printk("ERROR! current->fs->pwd == NULL\n"); 
#endif
	  return; 
    }

    return; 
}








This is probably a stupid question: I've been working on a kernel
module to report on "changed files". 

It works just fine -- I wrap the orignal system calls with my
replacements which queue the filenames being modified, and when
another proccess reads from the device or proc entry, they get a nice
snapshot of what's going on in the system -- except that all the paths
are relative to the calling process. 

So, a little ignorance being a dangerous thing, I thought I'd be clever
and manually reconstruct the full path by walking up
current->fs->pwd->d_parent and padding d_name to the filename until it
hits root.

Unfortunatly, this approach causes kernel panics.  e.g., the attached
code snippet will inevitably bring down the machine if I call it
during in my replacement open, mkdir, rmdir, unlink routines -- and
tehy all work fine without itq. 

What am I not getting? I do see, before I go down, that there's a few
occasions where current() is NULL... 

Apologies in advance for a wordy, probably stupid question, but I'm
stumped.   

If this is not the right approach for what I'm trying to do (e.g. a
kernel space getcwd()), can someone point me to where I should look?

Thanks in advance, 

Mike Welles


----------------------------------------

(this is the greatly reduced version which does nothing but try and
reference current->fs->pwd)

void fill_full_path(char *name)
{ 
    if (current==NULL) 
    { 
#ifdef DEBUG
	  printk("ERROR! current == NULL\n"); 
#endif
	  return; 
    }

  if (current->fs==NULL) 
    { 
#ifdef DEBUG
	  printk("ERROR! current-> == NULL\n"); 
#endif
	  return; 
    }

  if (current->fs->pwd==NULL) 
    { 
#ifdef DEBUG
	  printk("ERROR! current->fs->pwd == NULL\n"); 
#endif
	  return; 
    }

    return; 
}






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-04-17 23:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-04-17 22:43 kernel space getcwd()? (using current() to find out cwd) Brian J. Watson
2001-04-17 23:28 ` Brian J. Watson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-16 22:42 Michael L. Welles
2001-04-17 12:30 ` Christoph Hellwig

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox