From: Praveen Rajendran <rp@sasken.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: linux timer performance ?
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 02:10:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ADF4D47.7B9B5EFD@sasken.com> (raw)
hi
I am working on a kernel module which requires the addition of a large
number of kernel timers to expire statistical values ( including time
) maintained in a table.
One alternative would be to use a single timer and traverse the entire
table and use the existing system time to expire the values ( comparing
it with the time already stored in the table )when the timer expires .
Following the method I describe first I would have to add a large number
of timers ( around 2000) ... would this cause any significant
performance drop ? which method should I use ?
thanks in advance
Praveen
next reply other threads:[~2001-04-19 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-19 20:40 Praveen Rajendran [this message]
2001-04-19 16:19 ` linux timer performance ? Jeremy Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ADF4D47.7B9B5EFD@sasken.com \
--to=rp@sasken.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox