From: Fabio Riccardi <fabio@chromium.com>
To: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: Zach Brown <zab@zabbo.net>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: numbers?
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:23:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AE0A8D2.3CD79B8D@chromium.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104202033160.2706-100000@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > On a Dell PowerEdge 1550/1000 the published TUX 2 result is 2765.
> >
> > If you take into account the fact that the 1550 has a faster processor
> > (1GHz) and a more modern bus architecture (Serverworks HE with memory
> > interleaving and a triple PCI bus), the performance is roughly the
> > same.
>
> the system was IO-limited (given that a ~9 GB fileset was running on a 2
> GB RAM system), so CPU speed has not a big impact. I'd say it makes no
> sense to compare different systems.
>From what I've seen the major impact comes from the disk IO bandwidth to
memory size ratio and from the PCI bus to memory bandwidth.
I agree that comparing different hardware architectures is a tricky business,
but you asked me to comment on some of the comparisons that you made...
> > The static pages work fine, the dynamic module gets executed, but for
> > some reason it fails to open the postlog file and to spawn the spec
> > utility tasks at reset time.
>
> the newest TUX code chroots into docroot, so you should either use "/" as
> the docroot, or put /lib libraries into your docroot.
Oh, the docs don't mention anything of that... I'll try to set the docroot as
you say
> > I'll make an alpha release of X15 available for download by the end of
> > next week, so people will be able to test it independently.
>
> (will source code be available so we can see whether it's an apples to
> apples thing?)
I'll release the source for the SPEC dynamic code dll, which indeed is just a
straight porting of the TUX dynamic code from the SPEC site.
- Fabio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-20 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-20 3:38 user space web server accelerator support Fabio Riccardi
2001-03-20 3:51 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-20 3:58 ` Fabio Riccardi
2001-03-20 3:59 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-20 4:07 ` Fabio Riccardi
2001-03-20 13:08 ` Erik Mouw
2001-03-20 16:01 ` Zach Brown
2001-03-23 3:53 ` Fabio Riccardi
2001-03-23 19:14 ` Zach Brown
2001-03-23 20:24 ` kernel support for _user space_ web server accelerator Fabio Riccardi
2001-04-18 16:19 ` numbers? Ingo Molnar
2001-04-20 19:35 ` numbers? Fabio Riccardi
2001-04-20 18:42 ` numbers? Ingo Molnar
2001-04-20 21:23 ` Fabio Riccardi [this message]
2001-04-21 3:42 ` numbers? Ingo Molnar
2001-04-20 20:53 ` numbers? Alan Cox
2001-04-20 21:12 ` numbers? Fabio Riccardi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AE0A8D2.3CD79B8D@chromium.com \
--to=fabio@chromium.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=zab@zabbo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox