public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Leete <tleete@mountain.net>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone  paying attention?
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 23:08:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AE0F999.BA288768@mountain.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010420085148.V13403@opus.bloom.county> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0104201206250.12186-100000@xanadu.home> <20010420125005.B8086@thyrsus.com> <20010420200859.B5510@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

[Cc: trimmed]

Russell King wrote:
> 
[...]
> 
> Generally it seems like diff needs to produce one more line of context, and
> most of these problems will go away.  Yes, there will still be the odd
> problem, so then it becomes the "how much do you crank the setting" problem.
>
 
$ diff -6 ...
will give 6 lines of context. patch will understand the output without any
extra help.

Cheers,
Tom

-- 
The Daemons lurk and are dumb. -- Emerson

  reply	other threads:[~2001-04-21  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-20  2:36 OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention? Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20  3:00 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20  3:17   ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20  4:07     ` james rich
2001-04-20  4:19       ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20  4:52         ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-04-20  5:17           ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-20 13:13           ` [parisc-linux] " Alan Cox
2001-04-20 13:35             ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 13:43               ` Alan Cox
2001-04-20 13:53                 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 14:03                   ` Alan Cox
2001-04-20 14:19                     ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 14:44                       ` Alan Cox
2001-04-20 14:59                         ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 15:51                           ` Tom Rini
2001-04-20 16:06                             ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-20 16:15                               ` Bob McElrath
2001-04-20 16:21                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20 19:00                                   ` Jeff Dike
2001-04-20 18:47                                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20 21:55                                       ` Jeff Dike
2001-04-20 18:53                                     ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-20 16:26                                 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-20 16:35                             ` Nicolas Pitre
2001-04-20 16:50                               ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 19:08                                 ` Russell King
2001-04-21  3:08                                   ` Tom Leete [this message]
2001-04-21  8:53                                     ` [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone rmk
2001-04-20 18:20                               ` [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention? Tom Rini
2001-04-20 18:48                                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2001-04-20 18:55                                   ` Tom Rini
2001-04-20 21:19                                   ` David Woodhouse
2001-04-20 21:24                                     ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 21:29                                     ` David Woodhouse
2001-04-20 21:35                                       ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 22:53                                         ` Alan Cox
2001-04-21  0:37                                           ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-21 23:39                                             ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-21 12:32                                           ` David Woodhouse
2001-04-23 21:12                                             ` [patch] fix broken symbols (was Re: OK, let's try ...) Arjan van de Ven
2001-04-20 21:39                                       ` [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention? David Woodhouse
2001-04-21  0:24                                         ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 18:50                           ` Russell King
2001-04-20 21:23                             ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-21  0:52                               ` Proposal for better attribution structure Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20  8:19       ` OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention? David Woodhouse
2001-04-20 19:47     ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 20:00       ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20 20:13         ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 20:55       ` Alan Cox
2001-04-21  6:48       ` [parisc-linux] " Grant Grundler
2001-04-21 14:52         ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 13:08   ` Alan Cox
2001-04-20 13:18     ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-07-29 10:47     ` Riley Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3AE0F999.BA288768@mountain.net \
    --to=tleete@mountain.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox