public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: change_mtu boundary checking error
@ 2001-04-18  7:25 Hen, Shmulik
  2001-04-18 12:22 ` Alan Cox
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hen, Shmulik @ 2001-04-18  7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-net, linux-kernel; +Cc: 'Alan Cox'

But Ethernet is not only for IP, what about other protocols ?

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Cox [mailto:alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 3:41 PM
To: shmulik.hen@intel.com
Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: change_mtu boundary checking error


> Now, the high boundary seemed reasonable (ETH_FRAME_LEN - ETH_HLEN =
> ETH_DATA_LEN) which gives 1500, but why is the low boundary set to 68 ?
> According to my calculations, it should have been ETH_ZLEN - ETH_HLEN
which
> gives 46.

The IPv4 minimum MTU is 68 bytes. Below that not all frames can be delivered



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-04-26 18:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-04-18  7:25 change_mtu boundary checking error Hen, Shmulik
2001-04-18 12:22 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-26 18:02   ` interesting problem with raw sockets Christopher Friesen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox