From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 May 2001 13:07:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 May 2001 13:07:09 -0400 Received: from chromium11.wia.com ([207.66.214.139]:30219 "EHLO neptune.kirkland.local") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 May 2001 13:06:58 -0400 Message-ID: <3AEEEE1D.F0C4F1F6@chromium.com> Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 10:10:53 -0700 From: Fabio Riccardi X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mingo@elte.hu CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox , Christopher Smith , Andrew Morton , "Timothy D. Witham" , David_J_Morse@Dell.com Subject: Re: X15 alpha release: as fast as TUX but in user space In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is actually a bug in the current X15, I know how to fix it (with negligible overhead) but I've been lazy :) give me a few days... - Fabio Ingo Molnar wrote: > hm, another X15 caching artifact i noticed: i've changed the index.html > file, and while X15 was still serving the old copy, TUX served the new > file immediately. > > its cache is apparently not coherent with actual VFS contents. (ie. it's a > read-once cache apparently?) TUX has some (occasionally significant) > overhead due to non-cached VFS-lookups. > > Ingo > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/