Re: iso9660 endianness cleanup patch

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com>]

Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> 
> Are you sure that the arguments of the following casting
> 
> > +     return le16_to_cpu(*(u16 *)p);
> 
> > +     return be16_to_cpu(*(u16 *)p);
> 
> > +     return le32_to_cpu(*(u32 *)p);
> 
> > +     return be32_to_cpu(*(u32 *)p);
> 
> are properly aligned ?
> I did not revise the code to check it, but AFAIK improperly aligned
> char* pointers cause problem with casting to pointers to 16/32-bit data
> on some architectures (I heard of sucj a problem with alpha).
> 
> Maybe there was a reason that the original code did operate on bytes here...
> 

Oh bother, you're right of course.  We need some kind of standardized
macro for indirecting through a potentially unaligned pointer.  It can
just do the dereference (e.g. x86), use left/right accesses (e.g. MIPS),
or do it by byte (others).

Ports people, what do you think?

	-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt