From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 May 2001 22:41:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 May 2001 22:41:31 -0400 Received: from armitage.toyota.com ([63.87.74.3]:16911 "EHLO armitage.toyota.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 May 2001 22:41:29 -0400 Message-ID: <3AF0C552.4259CB3C@lexus.com> Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 19:41:22 -0700 From: J Sloan X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Sim, CT (Chee Tong)" CC: "'J Sloan'" , Linux kernel Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Linux NAT questions- (kernel upgrade??) In-Reply-To: <1E8992B3CD28D4119D5B00508B08EC5627E8A5@sinxsn02.ap.rabobank.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Sim, CT (Chee Tong)" schrieb: > I am using the Red Hat 7, below are my kernel version. I feel Red Hat 7 is > quite new, although RH 7.1 has just come out. How come it still say that my > kernel version is old. Ah, by old is meant the 2.2 version - 7.1 is the first RH release to ship with kernel 2.4. You can certainly run a 2.4 kernel on your 7.0 box - I only ran 2.2.16 on my RH 7.0 boxes for as long as it tool me to pull down the kernel sources and compile a 2.4 kernel. cu jjs