From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 May 2001 04:45:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 May 2001 04:45:12 -0400 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:23242 "HELO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 3 May 2001 04:44:53 -0400 Message-ID: <3AF11A7E.9184627C@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 04:44:46 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Abramo Bagnara Cc: "David S. Miller" , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux Kernel Development , Alan Cox Subject: Re: unsigned long ioremap()? In-Reply-To: <15089.979.650927.634060@pizda.ninka.net> <3AF10E80.63727970@alsa-project.org> <3AF11211.B226543D@mandrakesoft.com> <3AF11953.54BBE72B@alsa-project.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Abramo Bagnara wrote: > > > That's indeed the reason to change ioremap prototype for 2.5. > > > > Say what?? > > > > Please give a look > http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0008.1/0338.html > http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0008.1/0407.html > > This was something that already got a wide consent. Let's not return unsigned long -- DaveM's suggestion is far better. unsigned long is not opaque enough, IMHO. -- Jeff Garzik | Game called on account of naked chick Building 1024 | MandrakeSoft |