From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 May 2001 13:01:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 May 2001 13:01:37 -0400 Received: from zcamail03.zca.compaq.com ([161.114.32.103]:32008 "HELO zcamail03.zca.compaq.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 3 May 2001 13:01:33 -0400 Message-ID: <3AF18E38.8EA6314C@zk3.dec.com> Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 12:58:32 -0400 From: Peter Rival Organization: Tru64 QMG Performance Engineering X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: "Cabaniols, Sebastien" , "'Andrew Morton'" , "'netdev@oss.sgi.com'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'davem@redhat.com'" , "'kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru'" Subject: Re: [BUG] freeze Alpha ES40 SMP 2.4.4.ac3, another TCP/IP Problem ? ( was 2.4.4 kernel crash , possibly tcp related ) In-Reply-To: <1FF17ADDAC64D0119A6E0000F830C9EA04B3CDD1@aeoexc1.aeo.cpqcorp.net> <20010503184610.T1162@athlon.random> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 06:16:02PM +0200, Cabaniols, Sebastien wrote: > > The only thing that does not work under load is the network.... TCP/IP ? > > My alpha is running 2.4.4aa3 under very high load (apache beaten from ab > in loop via 100mbit switched network [tulip on the alpha] plus cerberus) > and I didn't had any problem so far (it only deadlocked with OOM after > one day of day of tux [instead of apache] + cerberus regression testing > but that's only because of a memleak in tux that I reproduced on x86 too > it seems) > Silly question, Sebastien - when you do a "show config" at the console, how is your card represented? FWIU, there have been problems with adapters under load that aren't fully supported by SRM... Just a guess. Could you try this with a DE600 (Intel) or a DE500 (tulip)? - Pete