From: Todd Inglett <tinglett@vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Ferber <aferber@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>, Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SMP races in proc with thread_struct
Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 10:18:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AF2C857.BEEF889E@vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AF2A1CC.C22A48E7@vnet.ibm.com> <8541.988980403@ocs3.ocs-net> <20010504162126.A14679@kallisto.sind-doof.de>
Andreas Ferber wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:46:43PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
>
> > For a read only case, the only important
> > thing is not to die, one occurrence of bad data is tolerable.
>
> Strong NACK. The pages where the bad data comes from may in some cases
> already be reclaimed for other data, probably something security
> relevant, which should never ever be given even read access by an
> unauthorized user. Even if this event may be a very rare case, one
> single occurrence of this is one to much.
Agreed. Worse, it is not readonly. The /proc code task_lock's the task
struct, thus writing to it.
I'll post a patch shortly once I've tested it. Worse case only if the
task is exiting I sweep the tasklist looking for the parent to see if
the parent is still valid. I am not verifying if it is the actual
parent (it might be a new task allocated at the same spot). I could
just report 0 (or 1) for the parent for any process that is exiting, but
then you won't be able to see the ppid for zombies. Or is there another
state I can look for? What I really need is PF_EXITED :).
I am a little concerned also about mm, file, tty and sig fields. These
appear to be NULLed in do_exit(), but I haven't tracked down tty and sig
yet.
--
-todd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-05 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-01 14:30 SMP races in proc with thread_struct Todd Inglett
2001-05-01 16:50 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-03 11:47 ` Todd Inglett
2001-05-04 12:34 ` Todd Inglett
2001-05-04 12:46 ` Keith Owens
2001-05-04 13:11 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-05-04 13:38 ` Brian Gerst
2001-05-04 23:27 ` Keith Owens
2001-05-04 14:21 ` Andreas Ferber
2001-05-04 15:18 ` Todd Inglett [this message]
2001-05-04 16:04 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-04 17:52 ` [PATCH][RFC] " Alexander Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AF2C857.BEEF889E@vnet.ibm.com \
--to=tinglett@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aferber@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox