From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 5 May 2001 01:07:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 5 May 2001 01:07:39 -0400 Received: from femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.0.95.82]:50901 "EHLO femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 5 May 2001 01:07:24 -0400 Message-ID: <3AF389BD.81F9B398@home.com> Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 22:03:57 -0700 From: Seth Goldberg X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Athlon and fast_page_copy: What's it worth ? :) In-Reply-To: <006e01c0d4e9$3c0bd210$0300a8c0@methusela> <20010504172657.B14969@debian.org> <20010505155113.D29451@metastasis.f00f.org> <3AF37CD6.17677C56@home.com> <20010505163204.A29622@metastasis.f00f.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Before I go any further with this investigation, I'd like to get an idea of how much of a performance improvement the K7 fast_page_copy will give me. Can someone suggest the best benchmark to test the speed of this routine? Thanks, Seth