* Problems even with 512 block size MOs
@ 2001-05-02 17:42 Uwe Bonnes
2001-05-02 17:53 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-05 11:20 ` Giuliano Pochini
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Bonnes @ 2001-05-02 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hallo
recent 2.4 kernels have incredible bad performance for me when handling MO
drives. Going back 2.2 shows better performance.
This is my setup:
SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
ncr53c8xx: at PCI bus 0, device 15, function 0
ncr53c8xx: 53c810 detected
ncr53c810-0: rev 0x2 on pci bus 0 device 15 function 0 irq 16
ncr53c810-0: ID 7, Fast-10, Parity Checking
scsi0 : ncr53c8xx-3.4.3-20010212
Vendor: FUJITSU Model: M2513A Rev: 1500
Type: Optical Device ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Vendor: PIONEER Model: DVD-ROM DVD-303 Rev: 1.10
Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Detected scsi removable disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
ncr53c810-0-<0,*>: FAST-10 SCSI 10.0 MB/s (100 ns, offset 8)
SCSI device sda: 248826 512-byte hdwr sectors (127 MB)
sda: Write Protect is off
sda: unknown partition table
on a non-overclocked Dual celeron BP6 machine with 256MByte RAM
hertz:~> uname -a
Linux hertz 2.4.4-SMP #2 SMP Wed May 2 17:47:22 MEST 2001 i686 unknown
(recent kernel from ftp.suse.com/people/mantel/next)
Copying a 6.5 MByte file with cp returns nearly immediately on the
commandline, but umount nearly takes forever. Maximum rate detected by
xosview during umount was about 30 kByte.
I have similar behaviour on another machine and with different disk. However
I don't get any "dmesg" output despite the "CONFIG_SCSI_LOGGING=y" option on
both machines.
Are all my MO disks rotten? Are the MO drives broken? Are my SCSI adapters
broken? Or is there a bug in the SCSI layer?
Bye
--
Uwe Bonnes bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Problems even with 512 block size MOs
2001-05-02 17:42 Problems even with 512 block size MOs Uwe Bonnes
@ 2001-05-02 17:53 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-05 11:20 ` Giuliano Pochini
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2001-05-02 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uwe Bonnes; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-scsi
> Copying a 6.5 MByte file with cp returns nearly immediately on the
> commandline, but umount nearly takes forever. Maximum rate detected by
> xosview during umount was about 30 kByte.
>
> I have similar behaviour on another machine and with different disk. However
> I don't get any "dmesg" output despite the "CONFIG_SCSI_LOGGING=y" option on
> both machines.
That sounds like it isnt queueing multiple commands at a time. M/O has
an erase/write sequence so you want to queue large blocks otherwise its two
rotations per I/O
> Are all my MO disks rotten? Are the MO drives broken? Are my SCSI adapters
> broken? Or is there a bug in the SCSI layer?
SCSI layer or scsi driver I suspect.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Problems even with 512 block size MOs
2001-05-02 17:42 Problems even with 512 block size MOs Uwe Bonnes
2001-05-02 17:53 ` Alan Cox
@ 2001-05-05 11:20 ` Giuliano Pochini
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Giuliano Pochini @ 2001-05-05 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uwe Bonnes; +Cc: linux-kernel
> recent 2.4 kernels have incredible bad performance for me when handling MO
> drives. Going back 2.2 shows better performance.
> Copying a 6.5 MByte file with cp returns nearly immediately on the
> commandline, but umount nearly takes forever. Maximum rate detected by
> xosview during umount was about 30 kByte.
I have this one:
Vendor: FUJITSU Model: MCD3130SS Rev: 0020
and it works very well with 2.4. 2.2 kernel perform really badly because of
the famous merging problem.
> Are all my MO disks rotten? Are the MO drives broken? Are my SCSI adapters
> broken? Or is there a bug in the SCSI layer?
No probs here. I have an Adaptec SCSI card.
Bye.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-06 12:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-05-02 17:42 Problems even with 512 block size MOs Uwe Bonnes
2001-05-02 17:53 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-05 11:20 ` Giuliano Pochini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox