* Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS seems to be stable as of 2.4.4
[not found] ` <20010504192348.A11507@rotes20.wohnheim.uni-kl.de>
@ 2001-05-07 0:19 ` Hans Reiser
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Hans Reiser @ 2001-05-07 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dirk Mueller; +Cc: Chris Mason, reiserfs-list, linux-kernel
Dirk Mueller wrote:
>
> Now consider a good amount of fragmentation because those files get created
> over time (weeks, months etc). and you quickly degenerade to a scanning
> speed of maybe 10-20 files per second (Athlon 800, IBM 60GB HD with roughly
> 35MB/s linear read). It was that horrible that I quickly returned to mbox
> for those lists with high amount of traffic.
I think only a repacker can properly cure performance problems of slowly
accumulating files and directories . September 2002.
We can do other things that will gain 5 percent here and there, but the repacker
will be the real cure.
Hans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-05-06 22:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20010504182357.A20214@rotes20.wohnheim.uni-kl.de>
[not found] ` <341650000.988994279@tiny>
[not found] ` <20010504192348.A11507@rotes20.wohnheim.uni-kl.de>
2001-05-07 0:19 ` [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS seems to be stable as of 2.4.4 Hans Reiser
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox