Re: page_launder() bug

David S. Miller
2001-05-13T17:53:47Z

Rik van Riel writes:
> On Tue, 8 May 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Nice. Now the only bit left is moving the referenced bit
> > checking and/or state into writepage as well. This is still
> > part of the plan right?
>
> Why the hell would we want this ?

Because if it's a dead swap page the referenced bit is meaningless
and we should just kill off the page immediately.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com