public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* standard queue implementation?
@ 2001-05-09 15:21 Eli Carter
  2001-05-09 18:04 ` george anzinger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Carter @ 2001-05-09 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

All,

I did a quick look in include/linux for a standard implementation of an
array-based circular queue, but I didn't see one.

I was thinking something that could be declared, allocated, and then
used with an addq and a removeq.  A deallocator would also be good.

Is there such a beast in the kernel?  If not, it seems that having
something like this would reduce the potential for bugs.

Thoughts?

Eli 
-----------------------.   No wonder we didn't get this right first time
Eli Carter             |      through. It's not really all that horribly 
eli.carter(at)inet.com `- complicated, but the _details_ kill you. Linus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: standard queue implementation?
  2001-05-09 15:21 standard queue implementation? Eli Carter
@ 2001-05-09 18:04 ` george anzinger
  2001-05-09 19:06   ` Eli Carter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: george anzinger @ 2001-05-09 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Carter; +Cc: linux-kernel

Eli Carter wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> I did a quick look in include/linux for a standard implementation of an
> array-based circular queue, but I didn't see one.
> 
> I was thinking something that could be declared, allocated, and then
> used with an addq and a removeq.  A deallocator would also be good.
> 
> Is there such a beast in the kernel?  If not, it seems that having
> something like this would reduce the potential for bugs.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
Are you possibly looking for include/linux/list.h ?

Routines to build and manager doubly linked circular lists.

George

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: standard queue implementation?
  2001-05-09 18:04 ` george anzinger
@ 2001-05-09 19:06   ` Eli Carter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Carter @ 2001-05-09 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: george anzinger; +Cc: linux-kernel

george anzinger wrote:
> 
> Eli Carter wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I did a quick look in include/linux for a standard implementation of an
> > array-based circular queue, but I didn't see one.
> >
> > I was thinking something that could be declared, allocated, and then
> > used with an addq and a removeq.  A deallocator would also be good.
> >
> > Is there such a beast in the kernel?  If not, it seems that having
> > something like this would reduce the potential for bugs.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> Are you possibly looking for include/linux/list.h ?
> 
> Routines to build and manager doubly linked circular lists.

I've seen that, but no.  I want a queue of pointers, and the queue
can/should be of fixed length.  (I don't want to deal with
allocating/deallocating nodes for this... I just need something simple.)

For now, I'll just write my own, but I may try submitting it as a
"kernel library" type thing later on.

Thanks,

Eli
-----------------------.   No wonder we didn't get this right first time
Eli Carter             |      through. It's not really all that horribly 
eli.carter(at)inet.com `- complicated, but the _details_ kill you. Linus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-09 19:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-05-09 15:21 standard queue implementation? Eli Carter
2001-05-09 18:04 ` george anzinger
2001-05-09 19:06   ` Eli Carter

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox