From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 13:30:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 13:30:36 -0400 Received: from mg02.austin.ibm.com ([192.35.232.12]:42749 "EHLO mg02.austin.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 13:30:24 -0400 Message-ID: <3AF97EBB.9F0ABE9A@austin.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 12:30:35 -0500 From: "Andrew M. Theurer" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Kravetz CC: lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , samba-technical Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench In-Reply-To: <3AF97062.42465A53@austin.ibm.com> <20010509095658.B1150@w-mikek2.sequent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I do have kernprof ACG and lockmeter for a 4P run. We saw no significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on http://lse.sourceforge.net to post the test data. Andrew Theurer Mike Kravetz wrote: > > On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:29:22AM -0500, Andrew M. Theurer wrote: > > > > I am evaluating Linux 2.4 SMP scalability, using Netbench(r) as a > > workload with Samba, and I wanted to get some feedback on results so > > far. > > Do you have any kernel profile or lock contention data? > > -- > Mike Kravetz mkravetz@sequent.com > IBM Linux Technology Center