From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 May 2001 14:46:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 May 2001 14:45:52 -0400 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:54450 "HELO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 13 May 2001 14:45:46 -0400 Message-ID: <3AFED656.92362303@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 14:45:42 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.5-pre1 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , arjanv@redhat.com, Axel Thimm , "Manuel A. McLure" , "Rasmus =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=F8g?= Hansen" , ARND BERGMANN , Dunlap Randy , Martin Diehl , Adrian Cox , Capricelli Thomas , Ian Bicking , John R Lenton Subject: Re: PATCH 2.4.5.1: Fix Via interrupt routing issues In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > > > +/* we will likely need a better ifdef, something like > > + * ifdef CONFIG_EXTERNAL_APIC > > + */ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC > > I disagree. The IO-APIC is the chipset APIC. It is distinct from the APIC > on the processors. Disagree with which part? The fix, or likely needing a better ifdef? >>From the point of view of the Via southbridge chip, IO-APIC is external... The comment above the ifdef was more along the lines of, "Via on PPC (OpenPIC?) might need this too, not just io-apic" -- Jeff Garzik | Game called on account of naked chick Building 1024 | MandrakeSoft |