From: Jeff Golds <jgolds@resilience.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Wayne Whitney <whitney@math.berkeley.edu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 18:07:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B008169.6A6F46E@resilience.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105142143190.18102-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 May 2001, Jeff Golds wrote:
>
> > Ahh, it's totally obvious. 1 GB option = 890 MB, 4 GB option =
> > 4GB. Can I assume a linear relation and get 66.2 MB when I
> > select the 64 MB option?
>
> Where did you get the mythical "1GB" option?
>
> Last I looked we had "off", "4GB" and "64GB" ;)
>
Good try, except:
If you are compiling a kernel which will never run on a machine with
more than 1 Gigabyte total physical RAM, answer "off" here (default
choice and suitable for most users). This will result in a "3GB/1GB"
split: 3GB are mapped so that each process sees a 3GB virtual memory
space and the remaining part of the 4GB virtual memory space is used
by the kernel to permanently map as much physical memory as
possible.
If the machine has between 1 and 4 Gigabytes physical RAM, then
answer "4GB" here.
1 GB is not more than 1 GB so "off" is the correct choice, according to the docs.
Oh I get it NOW. "Off" means the docs are just plain "off".
-Jeff
--
Jeff Golds
jgolds@resilience.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-15 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-14 19:09 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory Jeff Golds
2001-05-14 19:29 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-14 20:01 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-14 22:50 ` Wayne Whitney
2001-05-14 23:25 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-14 23:39 ` Jeff Golds
2001-05-14 23:41 ` Jeff Golds
2001-05-15 0:44 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-15 1:00 ` Mohammad A. Haque
2001-05-15 1:07 ` Jeff Golds [this message]
2001-05-15 2:32 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-15 4:19 ` [PATCH] " Wayne Whitney
2001-05-15 0:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-15 1:57 ` Brian Gerst
2001-05-15 1:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B008169.6A6F46E@resilience.com \
--to=jgolds@resilience.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=whitney@math.berkeley.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox