public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Balazic <david.balazic@uni-mb.si>
To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:12:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B04D96B.FCDA69E9@uni-mb.si> (raw)

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk) wrote :

> > 
> > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.4-ac/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
> -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -malign-functions=4 -c -o apm.o apm.c 
> > {standard input}: Assembler messages: 
> > {standard input}:180: Warning: indirect lcall without `*' 
> > {standard input}:274: Warning: indirect lcall without `*' 
> > 
> > Does anyone know what's up with that? Kernel problem or binutils issue? 
> 
> binutils is issuing a correct warning but if we fix the warning old old binutils 
> will then refuse to assemble it right. 

What old old binutils ?
Isn't there a clear requirement for a minimum binutils version in
Documentation/Changes ( or maybe it is README ... ) ?

-- 
David Balazic
--------------
"Be excellent to each other." - Bill & Ted
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

             reply	other threads:[~2001-05-18  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-18  8:12 David Balazic [this message]
2001-05-18  8:51 ` Linux 2.4.4-ac10 André Dahlqvist
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-17 16:45 Alan Cox
2001-05-17 17:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-05-17 17:36   ` Alan Cox
2001-05-17 17:16 ` Chris Evans
2001-05-17 17:37   ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-17 17:47   ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-17 21:03     ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18  3:55       ` Sasi Peter
2001-05-18  4:03         ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18  6:06       ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 17:08         ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 17:45           ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 18:19             ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-18 18:23               ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 18:58                 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-18 20:12                   ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 20:24                   ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 20:09                 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 22:44                   ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 22:58                     ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-19  2:12                       ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-19  2:32                         ` Mike Castle
2001-05-19  6:45                         ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-19  4:40                       ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-17 17:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-05-17 18:33 ` Udo A. Steinberg
2001-05-17 18:40   ` Matti Aarnio
2001-05-17 18:51     ` Matti Aarnio
2001-05-17 19:21   ` Alan Cox
2001-05-17 18:46 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-17 19:00   ` J . A . Magallon
2001-05-17 19:05     ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-17 19:26     ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B04D96B.FCDA69E9@uni-mb.si \
    --to=david.balazic@uni-mb.si \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox