From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 16:11:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 16:11:15 -0400 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com ([161.114.64.105]:19720 "HELO zmamail05.zma.compaq.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 16:10:59 -0400 Message-ID: <3B0580C7.E3642EDB@zk3.dec.com> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 16:06:31 -0400 From: Peter Rival Organization: Tru64 QMG Performance Engineering X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David S. Miller" Cc: J Sloan , Ronald Bultje , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Linux scalability? In-Reply-To: <990173560.6346.0.camel@adslgw> <990174686.12881.18.camel@tux.bitfreak.net> <3B0577E0.A4CAF354@mirai.cx> <15109.31311.679701.484140@pizda.ninka.net> <3B057C33.7874AF71@zk3.dec.com> <15109.32441.934579.331052@pizda.ninka.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "David S. Miller" wrote: > Peter Rival writes: > > Really? I just checked and it's still there from what I see. We're talking > > about the Dell 8450/700 w/ IIS & SWC 3.0 result, right? I'm hoping that > > they're deemed NC, but I don't see it yet... > > Sorry, they are there in the table, but marked as NC. > > Maybe you need to hit reload in your browser :-) > Yup, one of them is marked as NC. But the other one is still there (and I hit reload and even shift-reload). So either you're missing the second one or something is not behaving nicely with our web proxies here. While I'd probably be more inclined to believe the latter... ;) - Pete