From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 01:14:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 01:14:47 -0400 Received: from idiom.com ([216.240.32.1]:47111 "EHLO idiom.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 01:14:39 -0400 Message-ID: <3B09F53E.FE67E795@namesys.com> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 22:12:30 -0700 From: Hans Reiser Organization: Namesys X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ricardo Galli CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, timothy@monkey.org, Guillem Cantallops Ramis , "Yury Yu. Rupasov" , reiserfs-dev@namesys.com Subject: Re: New XFS, ReiserFS and Ext2 benchmarks In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ricardo Galli wrote: > > Hi, > you can find at http://bulma.lug.net/static/ a few new benchmarks among > Reiser, XFS and Ext2 (also one with JFS). > > This time there is a comprehensive Hans' Mongo benchmarks > (http://bulma.lug.net/static/mongo/ )and a couple of kernel compilations and > read/write/fsync operations tests (I was very careful of populating the > cache before the measures for the last two cases). > > Regards, > > --ricardo > http://m3d.uib.es/~gallir/ These are interesting benchmarks, my only caveats are that make bzImage is probably CPU bound not IO bound (the traditional value of compiles as FS benchmarks does not apply to Linux filesystems, as they don't do the misdesigned synchronization policy of older Unices, and compiles are CPU bound for them in my experience), that I don't understand fully why we are so much faster at the cp -ar, and I would like Yura to try to reproduce the cp -ar as it seems too good to be true. Thanks for investing the time into this Ricardo. Hans