From: "Martin.Knoblauch" <Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de>
To: hpa@transmeta.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Output of L1,L2 and L3 cache sizes to /proc/cpuinfo
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:55:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B0A3794.15BDF9D6@TeraPort.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B0A28C0.2FFFC935@TeraPort.de>
"Martin.Knoblauch" wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> while trying to enhance a small hardware inventory script, I found that
> >> cpuinfo is missing the details of L1, L2 and L3 size, although they may
> >> be available at boot time. One could of cource grep them from "dmesg"
> >> output, but that may scroll away on long lived systems.
> >>
> >
> >Any particular reason this needs to be done in the kernel, as opposed
> >to having your script read /dev/cpu/*/cpuid?
> >
> > -hpa
>
> terse answer: probably the same reason as for most stuff in
> /proc/cpuinfo :-)
>
After some checking, I could have made the answer a bit less terse:
- it would require that the kernel is compiled with cpuid [module]
support
- not everybody may want enable this, just for getting one or two
harmless numbers.
- you would need a utility with root permission to analyze the cpuid
info. The
cahce info does not seem to be there in clear ascii.
- this limits my script to root users, or you need the setuid-bit on
the
utility. Not really good for security.
- the cpuid stuff is i386 specific [today]. So are my changes. But
implementing
them for other architectures [if there is interest in the info] would
not
require to also implement the cpuid on other architectures. Which may
not make any
sense at all.
So, having the numbers in clear text in the cpuinfo file looks simpler
and safer to me, although reading /dev/cpu/*/cpuinfo maybe more
versatile [on i386] - at some cost.
Question: are there any utilities or other uses for the cpuid device
today? Just interested. The kernel seems to work well without it.
Cheers
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-22 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-22 8:52 [Patch] Output of L1,L2 and L3 cache sizes to /proc/cpuinfo Martin.Knoblauch
2001-05-22 9:55 ` Martin.Knoblauch [this message]
2001-05-22 16:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-22 18:08 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-22 23:57 ` Martin Knoblauch
2001-05-23 0:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-23 0:18 ` Tomas Telensky
2001-05-23 1:08 ` Dave Jones
2001-05-23 9:24 ` Martin.Knoblauch
2001-05-23 1:48 ` Dave Jones
2001-05-23 7:10 ` Martin.Knoblauch
2001-05-22 16:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-21 12:39 Martin.Knoblauch
2001-05-21 15:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-22 2:59 ` Steven Walter
2001-05-22 3:22 ` Dave Jones
2001-05-22 4:44 ` David Weinehall
2001-05-22 11:15 ` Dave Jones
2001-05-22 22:47 ` Tomas Telensky
2001-05-22 23:43 ` Dave Jones
2001-05-22 23:50 ` Martin Knoblauch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B0A3794.15BDF9D6@TeraPort.de \
--to=martin.knoblauch@teraport.de \
--cc=hpa@transmeta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox