From: Martin Knoblauch <martin.knoblauch@teraport.de>
To: ttel5535@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] Output of L1,L2 and L3 cache sizes to /proc/cpuinfo
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 01:50:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B0AFB50.11996EC5@teraport.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105230032440.31122-100000@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Tomas Telensky wrote:
>
> On 21 May 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > Followup to: <3B090C81.53F163C3@TeraPort.de>
> > By author: "Martin.Knoblauch" <Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de>
> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > while trying to enhance a small hardware inventory script, I found that
> > > cpuinfo is missing the details of L1, L2 and L3 size, although they may
> > > be available at boot time. One could of cource grep them from "dmesg"
> > > output, but that may scroll away on long lived systems.
> > >
> >
> > Any particular reason this needs to be done in the kernel, as opposed
>
> It is already done in kernel, because it's displaying :)
> So, once evaluated, why not to give it to /proc/cpuinfo. I think it makes
> sense and gives it things in order.
>
That came to my mind as an pro argument also. The work is already done
in setup.c, so why not expose it at the same place where the other stuff
is. After all, it is just a more detailed output of the already
available "cache size" line.
Martin
PS: At least, I am not being ignored :-) No need for me to complain...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-22 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-21 12:39 [Patch] Output of L1,L2 and L3 cache sizes to /proc/cpuinfo Martin.Knoblauch
2001-05-21 15:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-22 2:59 ` Steven Walter
2001-05-22 3:22 ` Dave Jones
2001-05-22 4:44 ` David Weinehall
2001-05-22 11:15 ` Dave Jones
2001-05-22 22:47 ` Tomas Telensky
2001-05-22 23:43 ` Dave Jones
2001-05-22 23:50 ` Martin Knoblauch [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-22 8:52 Martin.Knoblauch
2001-05-22 9:55 ` Martin.Knoblauch
2001-05-22 16:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-22 18:08 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-22 23:57 ` Martin Knoblauch
2001-05-23 0:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-23 0:18 ` Tomas Telensky
2001-05-23 1:08 ` Dave Jones
2001-05-23 9:24 ` Martin.Knoblauch
2001-05-23 1:48 ` Dave Jones
2001-05-23 7:10 ` Martin.Knoblauch
2001-05-22 16:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B0AFB50.11996EC5@teraport.de \
--to=martin.knoblauch@teraport.de \
--cc=hpa@transmeta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ttel5535@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox