From: Vasco Figueira <figueira@europe.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.4 kernel freeze for unknown reason
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 04:59:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B131E9E.70505@europe.com> (raw)
Hi all,
On Fri May 11 2001 - 13:45:24 EST, Vincent Stemen
(linuxkernel@AdvancedResearch.org) wrote:
>On Wednesday 09 May 2001 22:57, Jacky Liu wrote:
>> The machine has been randomly lockup (totally freeze) for number of
>> times without any traceable clue or error message. Usually the time
>> frame between each lockup is between 24 to 72 hours. The screen just
>> freeze when it's lockup (either in Console or X) and no "kernel >panic"
>> type or any error message prompt up. All services (SSH, DNS, etc..)
>> are dead when it's lockup
(...)
>I have been experiencing these same problems since version 2.4.0.
>Although, I think it has improved a little in 2.4.4, it still locks
>up. The problem seems to be related to memory management and/or swap,
>and is seems to do it primarily on machines with over 128Mb of RAM.
>Although, I have not tested systematically enough to confirm this.
I have the same problem on a Toshiba satellite 4070, 366 celeron, 64M
ram, redhat 7.1 and vanilla 2.4.5. Exactly the same bug description.
Totally reproducible.
>I have been monitoring the memory usage constantly with the gnome
>memory usage meter and noticed that as swap grows it is never freed
>back up. I can kill off most of the large applications, such as
>netscape, xemacs, etc, and little or no memory and swap will be freed.
>Once swap is full after a few days, my machine will lock up.
After a few *hours*.
Then I have (as you said) to do swapoff /dev/hda4 ; swapon -a in order
to free the swap. If I do this, everything is fine... till it fills up
again.
>(...)I am
>disappointed that we are now on the forth 2.4.x kernel version and
>such as serious problem that has been there since 2.4.0 still exists.
>This is pretty much a show stopper for having a production machine.
Totally agree. This is quite a showstopper. Do_try_to_free_pages, err...
sorry, fix_bug.
Regards,
Vasco Figueira
next reply other threads:[~2001-05-29 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-29 3:59 Vasco Figueira [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-15 7:13 2.4.4 kernel freeze for unknown reason Jacky Liu
2001-05-16 5:25 ` Vincent Stemen
2001-05-11 2:26 Jacky Liu
2001-05-10 3:57 Jacky Liu
2001-05-11 18:45 ` Vincent Stemen
2001-05-11 18:46 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-12 6:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-12 11:18 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-12 13:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-12 14:25 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-12 15:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-13 18:16 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-05-14 4:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-13 6:17 ` Vincent Stemen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B131E9E.70505@europe.com \
--to=figueira@europe.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox