Re: [PATCH] net #9

[Hermann Himmelbauer <dusty@violin.dyndns.org>]

Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> > This is ANSI C standard stuff.  If a static object with a scalar type is
> > not explicitly initialized, it is initialized to zero by default.
> >
> > Sure we can get gcc to recognize that case, but why use gcc to work
> > around code that avoids an ANSI feature?
> 
>         Good standard don't mandate the implementation. And as
> somebody doing some other language said, there is more than one way to
> do it.

Hmmm, I understand both sides perfectly, but what about that one:

int n; /* n=0 */

Would that be a compromise?

		Regards,
		Hermann


-- 
 ,_,
(O,O)     "There is more to life than increasing its speed."
(   )     -- Gandhi
-"-"--------------------------------------------------------------