* unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5 bug)
[not found] <3B167AFD.EC1897E1@namesys.com>
@ 2001-05-31 18:23 ` Federico Sevilla III
2001-05-31 21:32 ` unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5 Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Federico Sevilla III @ 2001-05-31 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ReiserFS Mailing List; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Alan Cox
Here are some experiences with the unmount issue(s) concerning Linux
kernel 2.4.5-ac5, (in my case) the 3ware RAID controller, and ReiserFS.
I'm using kernel 2.4.5-ac5 and have a 3ware Escalade 6400 controller
(firmware upgraded to v6.6 to fix RAID5 issue) with four disks on 64k
RAID5.
I do not get kernel oopses when I unmount, but I noticed that unmounts
(whether called by root or during shutdown) "freeze" and cause the
controller to do an initializing scan of the array to verify parity (which
it normally only does when the first laying out of zeroes doesn't go
properly).
After a first unmount (when called by root), subsequent unmount attempts
or even syncs (using the sync utility) will "freeze" as if waiting for the
drives to respond. Other file activity is normal but a little slow (as
they normally are when initializing scans are being done by the hardware
RAID controller).
I haven't found any NULLs at the start of recently created or modified
files, and things seem to be okay except for this issue when unmounting.
As a matter of fact during the last time this "freeze" happened I gathered
my wits to help me from panicking (the company's data's on this box, it's
our main Samba fileserver) and created a small file with a few text, then
stopped all my applications (the ones I could stop using the /etc/init.d
scripts) and killed the power.
When I rebooted, the 3ware controller's BIOS of course told me that the
initializing scan would commence after the OS was loaded (as expected).
Boot up was normal, ReiserFS replayed transactions pretty quickly without
any wierd comments, and then I checked the files I remember were changed
or the small test file I created and ... everything seemed to be in order,
intact, and as if nothing untoward happened. Well, at least I didn't find
anything that looked untoward/messed up. I hope everything is indeed in
order (I've got both my fingers crossed and this honestly makes typing a
little difficult ;> ).
I'm staying on 2.4.5-ac5 for whatever it's worth (putting my life on the
line for the community? kidding...) and will report anything new. I will
be on the lookout for later ac patches, 2.4.6 ... and hopefully anything
anybody can share with me about this. I hope we'll see an end to these
issues soon. May all those actually doing work on it be blessed. :)
--> Jijo
--
Linux, MS-DOS, and Windows NT ...
... also known as the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5
2001-05-31 18:23 ` unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5 bug) Federico Sevilla III
@ 2001-05-31 21:32 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-31 22:04 ` Jordan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2001-05-31 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Federico Sevilla III
Cc: ReiserFS Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Alan Cox
> I'm staying on 2.4.5-ac5 for whatever it's worth (putting my life on the
> line for the community? kidding...) and will report anything new. I will
> be on the lookout for later ac patches, 2.4.6 ... and hopefully anything
> anybody can share with me about this. I hope we'll see an end to these
Can you tell me if 2.4.5-ac4 is ok. ac5 has a small 'obviously correct'
reiserfs module unload change that seems the first suspect
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5
2001-05-31 21:32 ` unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5 Alan Cox
@ 2001-05-31 22:04 ` Jordan
2001-06-01 8:56 ` thunder7
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jordan @ 2001-05-31 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: Linux Kernel
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I'm staying on 2.4.5-ac5 for whatever it's worth (putting my life on the
> > line for the community? kidding...) and will report anything new. I will
> > be on the lookout for later ac patches, 2.4.6 ... and hopefully anything
> > anybody can share with me about this. I hope we'll see an end to these
>
> Can you tell me if 2.4.5-ac4 is ok. ac5 has a small 'obviously correct'
> reiserfs module unload change that seems the first suspect
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
I have seen this same problem with unmounting in 2.4.5-ac5, it was
perfectly fine in 2.4.5-ac3 and ac4. I would guess the module unload is
what did it.
Jordan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5
2001-05-31 22:04 ` Jordan
@ 2001-06-01 8:56 ` thunder7
2001-06-01 9:37 ` Lech Szychowski
2001-06-01 17:10 ` Hans Reiser
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: thunder7 @ 2001-06-01 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 05:04:50PM -0500, Jordan wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > I'm staying on 2.4.5-ac5 for whatever it's worth (putting my life on the
> > > line for the community? kidding...) and will report anything new. I will
> > > be on the lookout for later ac patches, 2.4.6 ... and hopefully anything
> > > anybody can share with me about this. I hope we'll see an end to these
> >
> > Can you tell me if 2.4.5-ac4 is ok. ac5 has a small 'obviously correct'
> > reiserfs module unload change that seems the first suspect
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
> I have seen this same problem with unmounting in 2.4.5-ac5, it was
> perfectly fine in 2.4.5-ac3 and ac4. I would guess the module unload is
> what did it.
>
2.4.5-ac4 was fine, 2.4.5-ac5:
/space in /etc/fstab:
/dev/hda10 /space1 reiserfs defaults 1 2
strace umount /space1:
open("/usr/lib/locale/en_US/LC_TIME", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2441, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 2441, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4001f000
close(3) = 0
open("/usr/lib/locale/en_US/LC_NUMERIC", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=44, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 44, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40020000
close(3) = 0
open("/usr/lib/locale/en_US/LC_CTYPE", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=104804, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 104804, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40137000
close(3) = 0
SYS_199(0x40131ad8, 0, 0x40132760, 0x40130210, 0) = 0
semop(1074993880, 0x40130210, 0) = 0
brk(0x8056000) = 0x8056000
readlink("/space1", 0xbfffe51c, 4095) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
open("/etc/mtab", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=680, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40021000
read(3, "/dev/hde1 / ext2 rw 0 0\nproc /pr"..., 4096) = 680
read(3, "", 4096) = 0
close(3) = 0
munmap(0x40021000, 4096) = 0
oldumount("/space1"
and there it hangs. The kernel doesn't hang, but while 'mount' displays
/space1 as mounted, ls /space1/ says nothing. df -m reveals:
Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda10 2015 907 1005 48% /space1
Good luck,
Jurriaan
--
The music in my heart I bore long after it was heard no more.
William Wordsworth
GNU/Linux 2.4.5-ac5 SMP/ReiserFS 2x1402 bogomips load av: 5.60 2.71 1.16
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5
2001-06-01 8:56 ` thunder7
@ 2001-06-01 9:37 ` Lech Szychowski
2001-06-01 13:48 ` Lech Szychowski
2001-06-01 17:10 ` Hans Reiser
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Lech Szychowski @ 2001-06-01 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thunder7; +Cc: linux-kernel
> /dev/hda10 /space1 reiserfs defaults 1 2
/dev/sdb1 /var/log/LOGS reiserfs defaults 0 0
> strace umount /space1:
>
> open("/usr/lib/locale/en_US/LC_TIME", O_RDONLY) = 3
> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2441, ...}) = 0
> old_mmap(NULL, 2441, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4001f000
> close(3) = 0
> open("/usr/lib/locale/en_US/LC_NUMERIC", O_RDONLY) = 3
> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=44, ...}) = 0
> old_mmap(NULL, 44, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40020000
> close(3) = 0
> open("/usr/lib/locale/en_US/LC_CTYPE", O_RDONLY) = 3
> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=104804, ...}) = 0
> old_mmap(NULL, 104804, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40137000
> close(3) = 0
> SYS_199(0x40131ad8, 0, 0x40132760, 0x40130210, 0) = 0
> semop(1074993880, 0x40130210, 0) = 0
> brk(0x8056000) = 0x8056000
> readlink("/space1", 0xbfffe51c, 4095) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
> open("/etc/mtab", O_RDONLY) = 3
> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=680, ...}) = 0
> old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40021000
> read(3, "/dev/hde1 / ext2 rw 0 0\nproc /pr"..., 4096) = 680
> read(3, "", 4096) = 0
> close(3) = 0
> munmap(0x40021000, 4096) = 0
> oldumount("/space1"
strace /sbin/umount /dev/sdb1
execve("/sbin/umount", ["/sbin/umount", "/dev/sdb1"], [/* 30 vars */]) = 0
brk(0) = 0x80500c0
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40016000
open("/etc/ld.so.preload", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat64(0x3, 0xbfffedb4) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 37548, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40017000
close(3) = 0
open("/lib/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\264\323"..., 1024) = 1024
fstat64(0x3, 0xbfffedfc) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 1116516, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40021000
mprotect(0x40128000, 39268, PROT_NONE) = 0
old_mmap(0x40128000, 24576, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x106000) = 0x40128000
old_mmap(0x4012e000, 14692, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4012e000
close(3) = 0
munmap(0x40017000, 37548) = 0
getpid() = 421
brk(0) = 0x80500c0
brk(0x80500e8) = 0x80500e8
brk(0x8051000) = 0x8051000
SYS_199(0x4012ca58, 0, 0x4012d760, 0x4012b1f0, 0) = 0
semop(1074973272, 0x4012b1f0, 0) = 0
brk(0x8053000) = 0x8053000
readlink("/dev", 0xbfffe96c, 4095) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
readlink("/dev/sdb1", 0xbfffe96c, 4095) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
open("/etc/mtab", O_RDONLY|0x8000) = 3
fstat64(0x3, 0xbffff6ec) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40017000
read(3, "/dev/sda6 / ext2 rw 0 0\n/dev/sda"..., 4096) = 273
read(3, "", 4096) = 0
close(3) = 0
munmap(0x40017000, 4096) = 0
oldumount("/var/log/LOGS"
> and there it hangs. The kernel doesn't hang,
Ditto.
> but while 'mount' displays
> /space1 as mounted, ls /space1/ says nothing. df -m reveals:
>
> Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda10 2015 907 1005 48% /space1
In my case:
- before umount:
root@logs2:/mnt# df
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda6 8130996 1356716 6354584 18% /
/dev/sda7 8130996 20 7711280 1% /spare
/dev/sda8 2038472 44 1933204 1% /home
/dev/sda9 2038472 41964 1891284 3% /tmp
/dev/sda10 14016248 46444 13969804 1% /mnt
/dev/sdb1 35542688 32840 35509848 1% /mnt/log/LOGS
- after (unfinished od course) umount:
lech7@logs2:~$ df
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda6 8130996 1356572 6354728 18% /
/dev/sda7 8130996 20 7711280 1% /spare
/dev/sda8 2038472 44 1933204 1% /home
/dev/sda9 2038472 41968 1891280 3% /tmp
/dev/sda10 14016248 46540 13969708 1% /var
/dev/sdb1 14016248 46540 13969708 1% /var/log/LOGS
--
Leszek.
-- lech7@pse.pl 2:480/33.7 -- REAL programmers use INTEGERS --
-- speaking just for myself...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5
2001-06-01 9:37 ` Lech Szychowski
@ 2001-06-01 13:48 ` Lech Szychowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Lech Szychowski @ 2001-06-01 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Looks like -ac6 has fixed this problem :)
--
Leszek.
-- lech7@pse.pl 2:480/33.7 -- REAL programmers use INTEGERS --
-- speaking just for myself...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5
2001-06-01 8:56 ` thunder7
2001-06-01 9:37 ` Lech Szychowski
@ 2001-06-01 17:10 ` Hans Reiser
2001-06-01 17:47 ` unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: Alan Cox
2001-06-01 18:05 ` unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5 Alexander Viro
1 sibling, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Hans Reiser @ 2001-06-01 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thunder7; +Cc: linux-kernel, Alexander Viro
known VFS bug, ask viro for details, 2.4.5 is not stable because of it, use
2.4.4
Hans
thunder7@xs4all.nl wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 05:04:50PM -0500, Jordan wrote:
> > Alan Cox wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm staying on 2.4.5-ac5 for whatever it's worth (putting my life on the
> > > > line for the community? kidding...) and will report anything new. I will
> > > > be on the lookout for later ac patches, 2.4.6 ... and hopefully anything
> > > > anybody can share with me about this. I hope we'll see an end to these
> > >
> > > Can you tell me if 2.4.5-ac4 is ok. ac5 has a small 'obviously correct'
> > > reiserfs module unload change that seems the first suspect
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> > I have seen this same problem with unmounting in 2.4.5-ac5, it was
> > perfectly fine in 2.4.5-ac3 and ac4. I would guess the module unload is
> > what did it.
> >
> 2.4.5-ac4 was fine, 2.4.5-ac5:
>
> /space in /etc/fstab:
>
> /dev/hda10 /space1 reiserfs defaults 1 2
>
> strace umount /space1:
>
> open("/usr/lib/locale/en_US/LC_TIME", O_RDONLY) = 3
> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2441, ...}) = 0
> old_mmap(NULL, 2441, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4001f000
> close(3) = 0
> open("/usr/lib/locale/en_US/LC_NUMERIC", O_RDONLY) = 3
> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=44, ...}) = 0
> old_mmap(NULL, 44, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40020000
> close(3) = 0
> open("/usr/lib/locale/en_US/LC_CTYPE", O_RDONLY) = 3
> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=104804, ...}) = 0
> old_mmap(NULL, 104804, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40137000
> close(3) = 0
> SYS_199(0x40131ad8, 0, 0x40132760, 0x40130210, 0) = 0
> semop(1074993880, 0x40130210, 0) = 0
> brk(0x8056000) = 0x8056000
> readlink("/space1", 0xbfffe51c, 4095) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
> open("/etc/mtab", O_RDONLY) = 3
> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=680, ...}) = 0
> old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40021000
> read(3, "/dev/hde1 / ext2 rw 0 0\nproc /pr"..., 4096) = 680
> read(3, "", 4096) = 0
> close(3) = 0
> munmap(0x40021000, 4096) = 0
> oldumount("/space1"
>
> and there it hangs. The kernel doesn't hang, but while 'mount' displays
> /space1 as mounted, ls /space1/ says nothing. df -m reveals:
>
> Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda10 2015 907 1005 48% /space1
>
> Good luck,
> Jurriaan
> --
> The music in my heart I bore long after it was heard no more.
> William Wordsworth
> GNU/Linux 2.4.5-ac5 SMP/ReiserFS 2x1402 bogomips load av: 5.60 2.71 1.16
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was:
2001-06-01 17:10 ` Hans Reiser
@ 2001-06-01 17:47 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-01 18:05 ` unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5 Alexander Viro
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2001-06-01 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans Reiser; +Cc: thunder7, linux-kernel, Alexander Viro
> known VFS bug, ask viro for details, 2.4.5 is not stable because of it, use
> 2.4.4
Or 2.4.5-ac6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5
2001-06-01 17:10 ` Hans Reiser
2001-06-01 17:47 ` unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: Alan Cox
@ 2001-06-01 18:05 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-02 6:13 ` Hans Reiser
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Viro @ 2001-06-01 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans Reiser; +Cc: thunder7, linux-kernel
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Hans Reiser wrote:
> known VFS bug, ask viro for details, 2.4.5 is not stable because of it, use
> 2.4.4
Different issue. Missing lock_kernel()/unlock_kernel() in kill_super()
appeared in -pre6 and was fixed in -ac2 or so. -ac5 apparently had
introduced something new, that had been reverted (fixing the problem)
in -ac6.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5
2001-06-01 18:05 ` unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5 Alexander Viro
@ 2001-06-02 6:13 ` Hans Reiser
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Hans Reiser @ 2001-06-02 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Viro; +Cc: thunder7, linux-kernel
Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
> > known VFS bug, ask viro for details, 2.4.5 is not stable because of it, use
> > 2.4.4
>
> Different issue. Missing lock_kernel()/unlock_kernel() in kill_super()
> appeared in -pre6 and was fixed in -ac2 or so. -ac5 apparently had
> introduced something new, that had been reverted (fixing the problem)
> in -ac6.
thanks for clarification.
Hans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-06-02 6:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <3B167AFD.EC1897E1@namesys.com>
2001-05-31 18:23 ` unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5 bug) Federico Sevilla III
2001-05-31 21:32 ` unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5 Alan Cox
2001-05-31 22:04 ` Jordan
2001-06-01 8:56 ` thunder7
2001-06-01 9:37 ` Lech Szychowski
2001-06-01 13:48 ` Lech Szychowski
2001-06-01 17:10 ` Hans Reiser
2001-06-01 17:47 ` unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: Alan Cox
2001-06-01 18:05 ` unmount issues with 2.4.5-ac5, 3ware, and ReiserFS (was: kernel-2.4.5 Alexander Viro
2001-06-02 6:13 ` Hans Reiser
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox