* should reiserfs root be ro?
@ 2001-06-01 4:26 John R Lenton
2001-06-02 9:40 ` Ben Ford
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: John R Lenton @ 2001-06-01 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 262 bytes --]
Should a box that has its root filesystem on a reiser fs mount
this root readonly? i.e. should 'read-only' be in lilo.conf?
--
John Lenton (john@grulic.org.ar) -- Random fortune:
It seems like the less a statesman amounts to, the more he loves the flag.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: should reiserfs root be ro?
2001-06-01 4:26 should reiserfs root be ro? John R Lenton
@ 2001-06-02 9:40 ` Ben Ford
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ben Ford @ 2001-06-02 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John R Lenton; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
John R Lenton wrote:
>Should a box that has its root filesystem on a reiser fs mount
>this root readonly? i.e. should 'read-only' be in lilo.conf?
>
no.
--
/me feel like got big wanker 'cause I be leet and 0wn3d sourceforge.
tulare on Slashdot.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-06-02 9:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-06-01 4:26 should reiserfs root be ro? John R Lenton
2001-06-02 9:40 ` Ben Ford
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox