From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rtl8139too in 2.4.5
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2001 08:36:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B18DDD6.9D20C5D4@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <UTC200106021230.OAA182199.aeb@vlet.cwi.nl>
Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
>
> My RTL8139 (Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8139A')
> was fine in 2.4.3 and doesnt work in 2.4.5.
> Copying the 2.4.3 version of 8139too.c makes things work again.
>
> Since lots of people complained about this, I have not tried to
> debug - maybe a fixed version already exists?
>
> One remark:
> 2.4.5 says "eth1: media is unconnected, link down, or incompatible connection"
> coming from 8139too.c line 1367. The code there is
>
> if (mii_reg5) {
> printk(KERN_INFO"%s: Setting %s%s-duplex based on"
> " auto-negotiated partner ability %4.4x.\n", dev->name,
> mii_reg5 == 0 ? "" :
> (mii_reg5 & 0x0180) ? "100mbps " : "10mbps ",
> tp->full_duplex ? "full" : "half", mii_reg5);
> } else {
> printk(KERN_INFO"%s: media is unconnected, link down, "
> "or incompatible connection\n",
> dev->name);
> }
>
> where mii_reg5 is tested against zero inside a conditional
> where we know that it is nonzero.
> Probably the outer test is wrong.
good spotting, though, it's the inner test that's wrong, and surrounding
logic. If the link partner is not advertising anything at all, mii_reg5
will be zero. But, if we are forcing media type, mii_reg5 might be zero
and we don't care, so people get a misinformative message. Not the core
problem (working on it) but a bug nonetheless.
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik | Echelon words of the day, from The Register:
Building 1024 | FRU Lebed HALO Spetznaz Al Amn al-Askari Glock 26
MandrakeSoft | Steak Knife Kill the President anarchy echelon
| nuclear assassinate Roswell Waco World Trade Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-02 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-02 12:30 rtl8139too in 2.4.5 Andries.Brouwer
2001-06-02 12:36 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2001-06-02 16:30 ` Jaswinder Singh
2001-06-03 16:41 ` Rogier Wolff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B18DDD6.9D20C5D4@mandrakesoft.com \
--to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox