From: Adrian Cox <adrian@humboldt.co.uk>
To: Marc Lehmann <pcg@goof.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>,
Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Au-Ja <doelf@au-ja.de>, Yiping Chen <YipingChen@via.com.tw>,
support@msi.com.tw, info@msi-computer.de, support@via-cyrix.de,
John R Lenton <john@grulic.org.ar>
Subject: Re: VIA's Southbridge bug: Latest (pseudo-)patch
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 23:10:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B1AB5BA.8060805@humboldt.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010519110721.A1415@pua.nirvana> <20010601171848.F467@cerebro.laendle> <3B17B4B0.9A805766@mandrakesoft.com> <20010601221637.B13797@cerebro.laendle>
Marc Lehmann wrote:
> Aren't PCI delayed transaction supposed to be handled by the pci master
> (e.g. my northbridge), not by the (software) driver for my pdc(?) I would
> also be surprised if my pdc actually used that feature, not to speak of
> the fact that the promise + harddisk worked fine in another computer (the
> data corruption was easily detectable, one couldn't even write 500megs
> without altered bytes).
Wrong way round. You're right that the pci master is supposed to handle
delayed transactions, but during data transfer the pdc is the pci master
and the northbridge is the PCI target.
--
Adrian Cox http://www.humboldt.co.uk/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-03 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-19 9:07 VIA's Southbridge bug: Latest (pseudo-)patch Axel Thimm
2001-05-19 16:11 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-19 20:27 ` VIA politics (was: VIA's Southbridge bug: Latest (pseudo-)patch) Axel Thimm
2001-05-20 0:44 ` VIA's Southbridge bug: Latest (pseudo-)patch Ingo Oeser
2001-05-20 19:40 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 17:17 ` Gerhard Mack
2001-05-21 17:25 ` Udo A. Steinberg
2001-05-21 18:21 ` Dan Hollis
2001-05-22 6:11 ` God
2001-05-22 9:10 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 18:19 ` Dan Hollis
2001-05-22 6:09 ` God
2001-05-19 16:42 ` Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
2001-06-01 15:18 ` Marc Lehmann
2001-06-01 15:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-01 20:16 ` Marc Lehmann
2001-06-03 22:10 ` Adrian Cox [this message]
2001-06-06 16:24 ` Marc Lehmann
2001-06-06 18:39 ` Dan Hollis
2001-06-06 16:31 ` Gérard Roudier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-21 17:28 Khachaturov, Vassilii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B1AB5BA.8060805@humboldt.co.uk \
--to=adrian@humboldt.co.uk \
--cc=Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=YipingChen@via.com.tw \
--cc=doelf@au-ja.de \
--cc=info@msi-computer.de \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=john@grulic.org.ar \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pcg@goof.com \
--cc=support@msi.com.tw \
--cc=support@via-cyrix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox