From: "Martin.Knoblauch" <Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: VM: Buffer vs. Cache
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 13:23:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B20B5B1.D659489F@TeraPort.de> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 995 bytes --]
Hi,
just being curious. Since 2.4.4, I am watching my systems memory
behaviour a bit:-) Just recently I realized the following: in the
evening I leave my 128MB system at about 20 MB, 2 MB Buffered and 100 MB
Cached (plus som 40 MB unneccesary swap :-)). When I come back in the
morning, Used is still at 20 MB (a bit down maybe) but Buffered is 50 MB
and Cached is 55 MB. For a few minutes the system is definitely more
sluggish than in the evening. Something I can excuse before my first cup
of coffe anyway...
So, what actually is the difference between Buffered and Cached.
Apparently quite a lot of the pages that are Cached in the evening are
Buffered 9 houres later.
Thanks
Martin
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch | email: Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de
TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309
C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111
http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: Card for Martin.Knoblauch --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="Martin.Knoblauch.vcf", Size: 375 bytes --]
begin:vcard
n:Knoblauch;Martin
tel;cell:+49-170-4904759
tel;fax:+49-89-510857-111
tel;work:+49-89-510857-309
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.teraport.de
org:TeraPort GmbH;C+ITS
adr:;;Garmischer Straße 4;München;Bayern;D-80339;Germany
version:2.1
email;internet:Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de
title:Senior System Engineer
x-mozilla-cpt:;-7008
fn:Martin Knoblauch
end:vcard
next reply other threads:[~2001-06-08 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-08 11:23 Martin.Knoblauch [this message]
2001-06-08 12:10 ` VM: Buffer vs. Cache Jonathan Morton
2001-06-19 7:27 ` Martin.Knoblauch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B20B5B1.D659489F@TeraPort.de \
--to=martin.knoblauch@teraport.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox