From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:34:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:33:44 -0400 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:45199 "HELO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:33:32 -0400 Message-ID: <3B28D949.8C56C963@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:33:29 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.6-pre3 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David S. Miller" Cc: Tom Gall , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Going beyond 256 PCI buses In-Reply-To: <3B273A20.8EE88F8F@vnet.ibm.com> <3B28C6C1.3477493F@mandrakesoft.com> <15144.51504.8399.395200@pizda.ninka.net> <3B28CB1A.E8226801@mandrakesoft.com> <15144.52565.566355.291642@pizda.ninka.net> <3B28D870.179876B1@mandrakesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > Pretty much any arch with a PCI slot can have multiple domains, now that > hotplug controllers are out and about. So it seems a generic enough > concept to me... Um, correction: that is assuming a certain implementation... you can certainly implement a hotplug controller as another PCI-PCI bridge, AFAICS, too. -- Jeff Garzik | Andre the Giant has a posse. Building 1024 | MandrakeSoft |