From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 13:26:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 13:26:24 -0400 Received: from [212.18.228.90] ([212.18.228.90]:44047 "HELO carrot.linuxgrrls.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 13:26:05 -0400 Message-ID: <3B2B9673.9050108@linuxgrrls.org> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 18:25:07 +0100 From: Rachel Greenham Organization: LinuxGrrls.Org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-ac6 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VIA KT133A crash *post* 2.4.3-ac6 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Justin Guyett wrote: >I remember seeing something about how some via ide chipsets (686b I think) >and [some?] ide promise controllers had problems with data corruption on >the IBM dtla-series udma drives, and that IBM stated the problem was with >the controllers. Is there a chance a problem like that could be screwing >up the kernel? > It's a thought - but then why only with some kernel versions? /me wonders if everyone who's having this problem is using IBM dtla drives... -- Rachel