From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: vlan@Scry.WANfear.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
Dax Kelson <dkelson@gurulabs.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@dwd.de>,
"vlan-devel (other)" <vlan-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Lennert <buytenh@gnu.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@nbase.co.il>
Subject: Re: [VLAN] Re: Should VLANs be devices or something else?
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:24:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B2FFB46.BBA2BA2C@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B2FCE0C.67715139@candelatech.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106191641150.17061-100000@duely.gurulabs.com> <15151.55017.371775.585016@pizda.ninka.net> <3B2FDD62.EFC6AEB1@candelatech.com> <3B2FEEE0.C57EC336@sch.bme.hu>
Marcell Gal wrote:
>
> I remember
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/
> was broken for about >300 devices. I do not know how's it today.
My VLAN code creates an entry for every vlan in /proc/net/vlan/
too, and it seems to quit creating entries after about 250 or so.
It's read-only info, so it doesn't seem to do too much harm.
I think there must be an 8-bit limit somewhere in the proc-fs.
> > Adding the hashed lookup for devices took the exponential curve out of
> > ip and ifconfig's performance, btw.
>
> n^2 for creating n devices (in the unfortunate increasing or random
> order),
> (not 2^n), I guess.
It definately isn't fast, but then again, it is fast enough when you
only have 500 or so interfaces. For the wierdos that want more, we
can just wait a little longer... :)
I'll offer the hashed-device-lookup
patch separately on my web site so it can be used if needed...
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear@excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-20 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-19 8:19 VLAN in kernel? Holger Kiehl
2001-06-19 22:11 ` Should VLANs be devices or something else? Ben Greear
2001-06-19 22:45 ` Dax Kelson
2001-06-19 22:49 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-19 22:52 ` Dax Kelson
2001-06-19 23:16 ` Ben Greear
2001-06-20 0:31 ` Marcell Gal
2001-06-20 1:24 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2001-06-20 8:10 ` [VLAN] " Eran Man
2001-06-20 9:32 ` Gleb Natapov
2001-06-20 7:21 ` [VLAN] " Sander Steffann
2001-06-22 6:12 ` Peter C. Norton
2001-06-22 6:27 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-22 6:36 ` Ben Greear
2001-06-21 22:10 ` [Vlan-devel] " Guy Van Den Bergh
2001-06-21 22:54 ` Ben Greear
2001-06-22 15:00 ` Matthias Welwarsky
2001-06-22 15:46 ` Chris Wedgwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B2FFB46.BBA2BA2C@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=Holger.Kiehl@dwd.de \
--cc=buytenh@gnu.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=dkelson@gurulabs.com \
--cc=gleb@nbase.co.il \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vlan-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=vlan@Scry.WANfear.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox