From: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 21:10:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B3173A0.F244EF5B@kegel.com> (raw)
Russell Leighton wrote:
> The lack of a good operating system _dependent_ interface
> makes running fast hard in Java when you need to do IO...
> yes, there is always JNI so you can add a little C to mmap a file or whatever,
JDK 1.4 beta comes with a way to memory-map files, and various
other I/O improvements (like poll(); see http://www.jcp.org/jsr/detail/51.jsp).
Chris Smith will have some nio benchmarks up on http://www.jlinux.org/
next week or so showing how well their nonblocking network I/O performs.
Sun is slowly getting their act together on the I/O front with java.
Still, the competition from C# and for that matter gcj will probably be
a good thing, keep 'em on their toes.
(Disclaimer: I served on the JSR-51 expert group, representing the linux
point of view, kinda.)
- Dan
next reply other threads:[~2001-06-21 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-21 4:10 Dan Kegel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-20 21:13 [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Holzrichter, Bruce
2001-06-20 21:17 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-06-20 9:00 Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-06-20 11:25 ` [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Aaron Lehmann
2001-06-20 11:25 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-20 17:36 ` Martin Dalecki
2001-06-20 19:27 ` Mike Harrold
2001-06-20 17:46 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-20 19:53 ` Martin Dalecki
2001-06-20 17:53 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-21 7:45 ` Albert D. Cahalan
[not found] ` <mailman.993067219.29993.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2001-06-20 20:16 ` Pete Zaitcev
2001-06-20 22:05 ` Alan Cox
[not found] ` <20010621000725.A24672@werewolf.able.es>
2001-06-20 19:15 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-21 9:40 ` Jonathan Morton
[not found] ` <mailman.993083762.1429.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2001-06-21 3:13 ` Pete Zaitcev
2001-06-21 13:59 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-21 16:48 ` Adam Sampson
2001-06-20 15:12 ` Ben Greear
2001-06-20 15:44 ` Russell Leighton
2001-06-20 16:32 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-06-20 16:54 ` Russell Leighton
2001-06-20 17:03 ` Tony Hoyle
2001-06-20 15:10 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-20 20:23 ` Tony Hoyle
2001-06-21 8:12 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-06-20 20:40 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-06-20 20:48 ` Tony Hoyle
2001-06-20 21:00 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-20 21:06 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-06-20 18:14 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-06-20 16:53 ` Larry McVoy
2001-06-20 12:36 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-20 21:14 ` Aaron Lehmann
2001-06-20 18:09 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-06-20 19:05 ` William T Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B3173A0.F244EF5B@kegel.com \
--to=dank@kegel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox