public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Deucher <adeucher@UU.NET>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: joeja@mindspring.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AMD thunderbird oops
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:26:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B38A988.A576028B@uu.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15EuQn-0003eT-00@the-village.bc.nu>

What's weird though is that it is rock solid as long as I don't use
athlon optimizations.  I'm not sure how much of a speed improvement they
provide, but everything's fine with i686, so I can't complain, besides I
doubt I can return the board at this point anyway.  BTW, which would be
better with an athlon, k6 or i686 optimization?  I've heard i686 is
faster, but I've never really looked into it too much myself.

Thanks,

Alex

Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > I get oopses too when I use kernels compiled for athlon on my redhat
> > 7.1, athlon 850 system.  runs rock solid when I compile for i686.  I
> > assumed the athlon optimizations in the kernel were broken, or gcc's
> > athlon optimization was, as I seem to recall some discussion of this a
> > while back on the LKML.
> 
> Most IWILL K266 people report this. Those who swapped them for other boards
> mostly report the problem then going away. Yes it could be a bug we trigger
> that by chance the IWILL boards show up more than others but I'm sceptical
> 
> Alan

  reply	other threads:[~2001-06-26 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-26 14:06 AMD thunderbird oops Alex Deucher
2001-06-26 15:07 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-26 15:26   ` Alex Deucher [this message]
2001-06-26 15:33     ` Alan Cox
2001-06-26 15:52       ` Dave Jones
2001-07-06 22:35       ` 2.4.6-ac1 will not build, 2.4.6 ok Tom Diehl
2001-07-07  1:00         ` Steven Cole
2001-06-28 12:55     ` AMD thunderbird oops Pierre Etchemaite
2001-06-28 19:57       ` Tim Moore
2001-07-01 11:06         ` Pierre Etchemaite
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-27 20:06 joeja
2001-06-28 20:33 ` Tim Moore
2001-06-26 13:22 Thomas Foerster
2001-06-26 13:45 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-26  8:26 Thomas Foerster
2001-06-26  9:09 ` Luigi Genoni
2001-06-25 16:24 joeja
2001-06-25 16:35 ` Keith Owens
2001-06-25  3:17 joeja
2001-06-25  6:55 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-25  7:05   ` Alexander V. Bilichenko
2001-06-25 20:33   ` Dan Hollis
2001-06-26  7:39   ` Thomas Kotzian
2001-06-25  9:40 ` Luigi Genoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B38A988.A576028B@uu.net \
    --to=adeucher@uu.net \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=joeja@mindspring.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox