public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org>
To: landley@webofficenow.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Microsoft and Xenix.
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:10:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B3940B0.AD057C60@coppice.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106250806150.21085-100000@twin.uoregon.edu> <01062510170903.04704@localhost.localdomain>

Rob Landley wrote:
> 
> On Monday 25 June 2001 11:13, you wrote:
> 
> > 1937 claude shannon A Symbolic Analysis of Relay and Switching Circuits,"
> >
> > 1948 claude shannon A mathematical theory of information.
> >
> > without those you're kind in trouble on the computing front...
> 
> Yeah, I know I've bumped into that name (and probably taken notes) somewhere.
>  Hmmm...  Might be from "Where wizards stay up late", or might have been an
> article linked from slashdot...  (I don't THINK it was mentioned in
> "Hackers"...  Rodents, where was the reference...  Crystal fire?  That's
> mostly hardware.  Accidental Empries?  Doesn't sound right...  Can't have
> been "Fire in the valley" because I haven't read that yet, it's still sitting
> on the bookshelf.  Not soul of a new machine, that's post-digital Equipment
> Corporation...)
> 
> I THINK that's in the set of notes that's on the box that's not hooked up
> right now...  (Shortage of monitors at home.)
> 
> This was the dude who decided to apply a binary and boolean approach to
> electronic computation, right?  I KNOW I've read some stuff about him... late
> last year?
> 
> Now I remember.  Slashdot linked to his obituary:

Shannon was one of the clearest thinkers of the 20th century, and yet
his name is hardly known outside his own field. Within his field he is
respected at the level of, say, Newton. It was a real loss to mankind
when he died a few months back.

Regards,
Steve

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-06-27  2:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-24  2:41 Microsoft and Xenix Wayne.Brown
2001-06-24  3:07 ` Mike Castle
2001-06-24 14:44   ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 15:13     ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-06-25 14:17       ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 19:57         ` Erik Mouw
2001-06-27  2:10         ` Steve Underwood [this message]
2001-06-25 19:30     ` Kai Henningsen
2001-06-25 20:19       ` asmith
2001-06-26 14:44         ` [comphist] " Rob Landley
2001-06-26 20:49           ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-26 20:52           ` Alan Cox
2001-06-26 21:21           ` Michael Meissner
2001-06-27 13:26           ` Jesse Pollard
2001-06-27 23:35             ` [OT] " Guest section DW
2001-06-24 14:32 ` Rob Landley
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-26  3:21 Jocelyn Mayer
2001-06-26 15:15 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-06-26 16:15   ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-26 16:42     ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 17:29 Wayne.Brown
2001-06-25  2:51 Wayne.Brown
2001-06-24 23:21 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 17:14 ` asmith
2001-06-25 14:54   ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24  2:59 Wayne.Brown
2001-06-22 22:41 Alan Chandler
2001-06-23 14:07 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24  0:13   ` Michael Alan Dorman
2001-06-24 14:18     ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25  1:45       ` Jeff Dike
2001-06-24 20:51         ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24  0:49   ` John Adams
2001-06-24 14:25     ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24  2:47   ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-06-24 10:36     ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24 22:41       ` Chris Meadors
2001-06-25  0:55       ` William T Wilson
2001-06-25 17:11         ` asmith
2001-06-25 18:18           ` Robert J.Dunlop
2001-06-25  3:17       ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-07-02 10:04       ` Juan Quintela
2001-06-25 19:23   ` Kai Henningsen
2001-06-26 15:16     ` Rob Landley
2001-06-26 21:26       ` Michael Meissner
2001-06-27  8:09         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-06-27 18:07           ` Peter De Schrijver
2001-06-27 13:43         ` Peter Bergner
2001-06-28 21:11     ` Thomas Dodd
2001-06-23 17:57 ` Mike Jagdis
2001-06-23 17:11   ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B3940B0.AD057C60@coppice.org \
    --to=steveu@coppice.org \
    --cc=landley@webofficenow.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox