From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:18:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:18:03 -0400 Received: from mail.muc.eurocyber.net ([195.143.108.5]:53483 "EHLO mail.muc.eurocyber.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:17:46 -0400 Message-ID: <3B3A06CD.97E9ACDB@TeraPort.de> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:16:13 +0200 From: Martin Knoblauch Organization: TeraPort GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.5-ac18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: ReiserFS patches vs. 2.4.5-ac series Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, what is the current relation between the reiserfs patches at namesys.com and the 2.4.5-ac series kernel? Namesys seems to have a small one for the "umount" problem and two bigger ones (knfsd and knfsd+quota+mount). All apply cleanly to vanilla 2.4.5, but the bigger ones fails against ac18 and ac19 (earlier ones also I would guess). Are some of the knfsd/quota fixes already in -ac? Thanks Martin -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch | email: Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309 C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111 http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759