From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:03:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:03:43 -0400 Received: from james.kalifornia.com ([208.179.59.2]:42043 "EHLO james.kalifornia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:03:31 -0400 Message-ID: <3B3A1F4A.1080603@kalifornia.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:00:42 -0700 From: Ben Ford User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1+) Gecko/20010625 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Wedgwood CC: Marty Leisner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mounting a fs in two places at once? In-Reply-To: <200106250212.WAA05336@soyata.home> <3B370250.1050305@kalifornia.com> <20010628004854.B7331@weta.f00f.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Chris Wedgwood wrote: >On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 02:20:16AM -0700, Ben Ford wrote: > >>Feature. It actually makes it quite nice when you want to allow >>chrooted user(s) access to a common directory, you just mount a >>partition in all the users home dirs. >> > >For security, this can be a bad idea. > 'tis very true. I have been using this for FTP users, such as allowing a common /mp3 download directory relative to each users jail. That is what I was referring to, should have been more specific. -b -- : __o : -\<, : 0/ 0 -----------