public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: kaos@ocs.com.au,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RFC: modules and 2.5
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 01:13:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B415489.77425364@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)

A couple things that would be nice for 2.5 is
- let MOD_INC_USE_COUNT work even when module is built into kernel, and
- let THIS_MODULE exist and be valid even when module is built into
kernel

This introduces bloat into the static kernel for modules which do not
take advantage of this, so perhaps we can make this new behavior
conditional on CONFIG_xxx option.  Individual drivers which make use of
the behavior can do something like

	dep_tristate 'my driver' CONFIG_MYDRIVER $CONFIG_PCI
	if [ "$CONFIG_MYDRIVER" != "n" -a \
	     "$CONFIG_STATIC_MODULES" != "y" ]; then
	   define_bool CONFIG_STATIC_MODULES y
	fi



The reasoning behind this is that module use counts are useful sometimes
even when the driver is built into the kernel.  Other facilities like
inter_xxx are [obviously] useful when built into the kernel, so it makes
sense to at least optionally support homogenous module treatment across
static or modular builds.

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | "I respect faith, but doubt is
Building 1024    |  what gives you an education."
MandrakeSoft     |           -- Wilson Mizner

             reply	other threads:[~2001-07-03  5:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-03  5:13 Jeff Garzik [this message]
2001-07-03  6:50 ` RFC: modules and 2.5 Sean Hunter
2001-07-03  7:05   ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03  7:16   ` Keith Owens
2001-07-03  7:24     ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03  7:39       ` Keith Owens
2001-07-03  7:44         ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03  7:48   ` Fang Han
2001-07-03  7:18 ` Keith Owens
2001-07-03 12:15 ` jlnance
2001-07-06 10:34 ` Rusty Russell
2001-07-07 14:12   ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-08  7:40     ` Rusty Russell
2001-07-11 22:04       ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-03 17:35 Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
2001-07-03 17:39 ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B415489.77425364@mandrakesoft.com \
    --to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
    --cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox