From: Juergen Wolf <JuWo@N-Club.de>
To: John Jasen <jjasen@datafoundation.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem with SMC Etherpower II + kernel newer 2.4.2
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 11:15:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B42DEC2.AAB1E65B@N-Club.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107021014230.15054-100000@flash.datafoundation.com>
John Jasen wrote:
>
> a) bad cable?
> b) not negotiating speed and duplex with the switch correctly?
> c) bad card?
>
Hi,
The same errors show up with the network cable plugged or unplugged on
all computers with the SMC card around here. But all these computers are
equipped with nearly the same hardware (see my first posting of the
/proc/pci file). Also the 2.4.6 kernel does not solve the problem.
> d) IRQ sharing causing a conflict?
I dont think so, at least I dont get a IRQ conflict message and there
is no other device shown as using the same interrupt. If I use the 2.4.2
kernel or a version below everything works fine on the same host.
Another strange effect is, that if I wait for quite some time (5-10
Minutes) while trying to start up the eth0 device with "ifconfig eth0
up" I see messages like
Jul 4 09:38:58 localhost kernel: eth0: Setting full-duplex based on MII
#3 link partner capability of 41e1.
Jul 4 09:39:00 localhost kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed
out
Jul 4 09:39:00 localhost kernel: eth0: Transmit timeout using MII
device, Tx status 000b.
Jul 4 09:39:02 localhost kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt,
IntrStatus=0x008d0004.
Jul 4 09:40:55 localhost kernel: eth0: Setting half-duplex based on MII
#3 link partner capability of 0001.
in between hundreds of "too much work at interrupt" messages. This error
also occures regardles of the network cable is plugged or unplugged.
Regards
Juergen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-04 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-02 11:55 Problem with SMC Etherpower II + kernel newer 2.4.2 Juergen Wolf
2001-07-02 14:18 ` John Jasen
2001-07-04 9:15 ` Juergen Wolf [this message]
2001-07-04 12:57 ` Francois Romieu
2001-07-06 7:48 ` Juergen Wolf
2001-07-06 11:44 ` Francois Romieu
2001-07-06 12:27 ` Juergen Wolf
2001-07-06 12:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-06 12:51 ` Juergen Wolf
2001-07-06 12:59 ` [PATCH] " Jeff Garzik
2001-07-06 15:04 ` Francois Romieu
2001-07-03 9:31 ` Florian Schmitt
2001-07-03 14:57 ` Olivier Sessink
2001-07-04 9:19 ` Francois Romieu
2001-07-04 15:30 ` Florian Schmitt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B42DEC2.AAB1E65B@N-Club.de \
--to=juwo@n-club.de \
--cc=jjasen@datafoundation.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox