public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "D. Stimits" <stimits@idcomm.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@localhost.localdomain
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again)
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 16:11:52 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B4394A8.10D0AFE1@idcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <994279551.1116.0.camel@tux>

Ronald Bultje wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> you might remember an e-mail from me (two weeks ago) with my problems
> where linux would not boot up or be highly instable on a machine with
> 256 MB RAM, while it was 100% stable with 128 MB RAM. Basically, I still
> have this problem, so I am running with 128 MB RAM again.

Some motherboards have ram requirements that might not be obvious
without reading the m/b manual. For example, some m/b's require
registered memory. Some don't work with ECC. Some require modules be
installed in pairs (of exact type match). Some require that larger
memory sticks be placed in earlier slots relative to smaller modules.
And if you add a wait state in the bios a marginal ram module can become
quite stable; the unstable version can behave differently under
different circumstances (including temperature). Check the m/b manual
and m/b web site for exact requirements, and make sure the ram matches;
even if your memory is good, it might not be good in your circumstances.

D. Stimits, stimits@idcomm.com

> 
> I've been running Mandrake 7.2 on another machine for some time - no
> problem, until..... I added another 64 MB RAM and tried to install
> redhat (25 times (!!!)) and Mandrake 8.0... Both crash with memory
> faults..... Redhat just freezes or givesa a python warning, Mandrake
> gives a segfault with a warning that "memory is missing".... Both refuse
> to complete installation...
> 
> I'm kind of astounded now, WHY can't linux-2.4.x run on ANY machine in
> my house with more than 128 MB RAM?!? Can someone please point out to me
> that he's actually running kernel-2.4.x on a machine with more than 128
> MB RAM and that he's NOT having severe stability problems?
> And can that same person PLEASE point out to me why 2.4.x is crashing on
> me (or help me to find out...)?
> 
> First machine is a Intel P-II 400 with 128 MB RAM (133 MHz SDRAM) and
> crashing when I insert an additional 128 - it's running RH-7.0 with
> kernel-2.4.4. Second machine is an AMD Duron 600 with 196 MB RAM (also
> 133 MHz SDRAM), crashing during the installation of both Mandrake 8.0
> and Redhat 7.1 and which used to run stable with 128 MB RAM or 64 MB RAM
> with Mandrake-7.2. Win2k runs stable on this machine in all
> configurations.
> 
> I'm getting desperate.... win2k is running stable and it's scary to see
> linux crash while win2k runs stable and smooth.
> 
> (ps I'm not subscribed to the list - please CC a copy to me when
> replying)
> 
> Thanks in advance for any help on this,
> 
> --
> Ronald Bultje
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-07-04 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-04 20:45 >128 MB RAM stability problems (again) Ronald Bultje
2001-07-04 19:11 ` J Sloan
2001-07-04 19:20 ` Charles Cazabon
2001-07-04 19:29 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-04 19:47   ` William Scott Lockwood III
2001-07-05  3:16   ` Bill Pringlemeir
2001-07-05  6:37     ` Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
2001-07-05 15:38       ` Bill Pringlemeir
2001-07-04 19:44 ` mark
2001-07-04 20:01 ` Jeffrey W. Baker
2001-07-04 20:05 ` George Bonser
2001-07-04 22:11 ` D. Stimits [this message]
2001-07-04 23:47 ` Peter Bornemann
2001-07-05  1:22   ` Reza Roboubi
2001-07-05  1:43     ` Charles Cazabon
2001-07-05  1:58     ` George Bonser
2001-07-05 15:51 ` Don Krause
2001-07-05 17:22   ` Gary White (Network Administrator)
2001-07-05 20:45 ` Peter A. Castro
2001-07-06 17:55   ` Ronald Bultje
2001-07-09 14:24     ` Andreas Bombe
     [not found] <01Jul4.172916edt.62972@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>
2001-07-05  8:44 ` Ronald Bultje
2001-07-04 20:57   ` Chris Bacott
2001-07-05  7:22   ` StarTux
2001-07-05  8:40   ` Reza Roboubi
2001-07-05 10:50     ` Ronald Bultje
2001-07-05 15:41       ` Reza Roboubi
2001-07-05  9:15   ` D. Stimits
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-04 20:06 Alessandro Motter Ren
2001-07-04 20:16 ` George Bonser
2001-07-04 20:52 ` Ronald Bultje

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B4394A8.10D0AFE1@idcomm.com \
    --to=stimits@idcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox